What do you dislike about HN and how would you fix it
11–17 of 17 posts
Re: What do you dislike about HN and how would you fix it
#12The fix? Format any paragraph which begins with a > character with left padding and a left border.
I would assume the fix is simple, but, looking now, the HTML HN generates is somewhat borked. The first paragraph of my comment is not in a
tag, though the remainder are, and all three paragraphs are nested within a single . (A should contain phrasing content, which
is not.) Styling paragraphs would probably necessitate fixing this first.
Re: What do you dislike about HN and how would you fix it
#13Also there are no build in filter or good oss client with filter. Filter by domain. I am tired to hide trash from vice guardian newyorker atlantic etc.
Thanks for asking. I hope somebody who has influence will read.
Or is there good client for my needs?
Re: What do you dislike about HN and how would you fix it
#14Unexplained downvotes are antithetical to rational discourse. Either downvotes should be abolished or they should require an explanatory comment.
Re: What do you dislike about HN and how would you fix it
#15Re: What do you dislike about HN and how would you fix it
#16When people use preformatted (indented) blocks for quoting material. (It's unreadable on mobile.) The fix? Format any paragraph which begins with a > character with left padding and a left border. I would assume the fix is simple, but, looking now, the HTML HN generates is somewhat borked. The first paragraph of my comment is not in a tag, though the remainder are, and all three paragraphs are nested within a single…
Re: What do you dislike about HN and how would you fix it
#17Unexplained downvotes are antithetical to rational discourse. Either downvotes should be abolished or they should require an explanatory comment.
But now I'm not so sure. I see people being a jerk to others more often than I want to stop and explain that you're really not supposed to be a jerk here. I see people who certainly seem to be shilling for a viewpoint more often than I want to take the time to call it out. I see bad logic (and even what sure looks like bad faith) more often than I want to take the time to correct.
Do I just let it go each time unless I'm willing to invest the time to explain? I am no longer sure that's going to improve the site. I fear it would instead lead to more bad behavior, lower quality posts, flames, and so on. I fear it could damage the site.