Live data from Hacker News

Some voters are sick of companies like Amazon paying no corporate tax

nytimes.com

11–20 of 175 posts

Re: Some voters are sick of companies like Amazon paying no corporate tax

#13
post #3

Really have to start taxing over revenues. It's long due.

Yea sure.. good way to kill incentives for businesses to re-invest their revenue and grow/innovate. Just tax on revenue he said... Holy shit the minds these days...

Re: Some voters are sick of companies like Amazon paying no corporate tax

#16

The article is reluctant to mention the reason why they got those tax rebates, and focuses on the way people feel about it. This seems like bad journalism. According to CNBC, “Amazon's low tax bill mainly stemmed from the Republican tax cuts of 2017, carryforward losses from years when the company was not profitable, tax credits for massive investments in R&D and stock-based employee compensation.” https://www.cnbc.c…

Those all sound like corporate tax policies. That's literally what they're talking about. Clearly, a growing portion of the electorate doesn't like those policies.

That's the first step in democracy, no? Engagement?

Re: Some voters are sick of companies like Amazon paying no corporate tax

#17
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One could argue that the consumers are the ones paying this too. Sales tax is almost always passed onto the consumer in the form of raised prices.

I don't understand: What's the difference in them passing on the sales taxes and passing on the corp. taxes, or indeed any other expense?

[deleted]

Re: Some voters are sick of companies like Amazon paying no corporate tax

#19

The article is reluctant to mention the reason why they got those tax rebates, and focuses on the way people feel about it. This seems like bad journalism. According to CNBC, “Amazon's low tax bill mainly stemmed from the Republican tax cuts of 2017, carryforward losses from years when the company was not profitable, tax credits for massive investments in R&D and stock-based employee compensation.” https://www.cnbc.c…

> carryforward losses from years when the company was not profitable

yes, this definitely should be talked about. Why can't people's income be carried forward like this as well?

If i made a lot of money one year, why can't i claim away taxes from years that i didn't make income (such that my tax bracket is lower)?

Re: Some voters are sick of companies like Amazon paying no corporate tax

#20
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One could argue that the consumers are the ones paying this too. Sales tax is almost always passed onto the consumer in the form of raised prices.

I don't understand: What's the difference in them passing on the sales taxes and passing on the corp. taxes, or indeed any other expense?

Agreed. But where the tax is coming from pushes society in one direction or another.

Picture this: all tax for the budget collected from pollution taxes, so: zero sales tax, zero wage tax, zero home owner taxes.

What do you think society will optimize in that case?

Yet currently we tax on labour and on home ownership, but not on Amazon. Look around an see the result.

Post reply on HN