Live data from Hacker News

2019 Pulitzer Prize Winners

pulitzer.org

11–20 of 63 posts

Re: 2019 Pulitzer Prize Winners

#11
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know - love him or hate him, you have to agree this is a pretty anti-Trump list. Whether he's actually corrupt or not, this is evidence that the media is stacked against him - history will show if they were right or not.

Which of the two award-winners that explicitly feature Trump do you feel is unfairly rewarded?

No, you see, because the reporters failed to uncover evidence of similar crimes “on the other side” they must be biased and therefore the enemy of the people.

Re: 2019 Pulitzer Prize Winners

#13
"A special citation to honor the journalists, staff and editorial board of the Capital Gazette, Annapolis, Maryland, for their courageous response to the largest killing of journalists in U.S. history in their newsroom on June 28, 2018, and for demonstrating unflagging commitment to covering the news and serving their community at a time of unspeakable grief. The citation comes with a $100,000 bequest by the Pulitzer Board to be used to further the newspaper’s journalistic mission."

This is great

Re: 2019 Pulitzer Prize Winners

#14
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know - love him or hate him, you have to agree this is a pretty anti-Trump list. Whether he's actually corrupt or not, this is evidence that the media is stacked against him - history will show if they were right or not.

No, you really don't. Debunking "claims of self-made wealth and reveal[ing] a business empire riddled with tax dodges" isn't anti-Trump. Neither is "uncovering President Trump’s secret payoffs to two women during his campaign". That's just the normal job of investigative journalism, and those make up all of two out of fifteen categories.

3 - you missed the cartoonist, but it's ok I generally agree with you

Re: 2019 Pulitzer Prize Winners

#19

Supposedly "Enemies of the People"

I don't know - love him or hate him, you have to agree this is a pretty anti-Trump list. Whether he's actually corrupt or not, this is evidence that the media is stacked against him - history will show if they were right or not.

It's evidence the media investigates the conduct of the President. Which... good?
Post reply on HN