Live data from Hacker News

An epidemic of fake influencers and the death of meritocracy

behindthequest.com

11–20 of 211 posts

Re: An epidemic of fake influencers and the death of meritocracy

#11

> This is how it works: someone working at facebook is taking bribes in exchange for the blue mark, a middle man will take your money (anywhere between $1000 and $15000 dollars, depending on your stupidity) and the friend at fb will submit an application for you to be verified. Hopefully it will be approved. This is interesting if true

Those seem like really low figures for bribes considering the average salary of a facebook employee.

Re: An epidemic of fake influencers and the death of meritocracy

#12

It's a older problem than Instagram. One reason why people don't trust experts is that they see fake experts like Cokie Roberts and Jim Cramer on TV all day.

I checked out a few "influencers" out of curiosity when I first heard the term. It's far worse than Cokie and Cramer. I mean, at least they are mildly interesting to watch or listen to. The new sort seemed invariably dull and vacuous to me. Unwatchable, unlistenable, unreadable, like Season 4 of 'Do you poop enough' on channel 138. I'm not even that picky. I figured it must be mostly fake.

Re: An epidemic of fake influencers and the death of meritocracy

#13
post #11

> This is how it works: someone working at facebook is taking bribes in exchange for the blue mark, a middle man will take your money (anywhere between $1000 and $15000 dollars, depending on your stupidity) and the friend at fb will submit an application for you to be verified. Hopefully it will be approved. This is interesting if true

Those seem like really low figures for bribes considering the average salary of a facebook employee.

"someone working at facebook" probably isn't an employee, most likely anything requiring case by case human discretion is a contractor position that pays shit.

On the other hand, this seems like a way to legitimately take your instagram career to the next level! Networking is about who you know, not about how many people you know. Knowing a Facebook verification contractor is some pretty ironclad social proof.

Re: An epidemic of fake influencers and the death of meritocracy

#14
post #11

> This is how it works: someone working at facebook is taking bribes in exchange for the blue mark, a middle man will take your money (anywhere between $1000 and $15000 dollars, depending on your stupidity) and the friend at fb will submit an application for you to be verified. Hopefully it will be approved. This is interesting if true

Those seem like really low figures for bribes considering the average salary of a facebook employee.

Maybe not for someone in customer support, though.

Re: An epidemic of fake influencers and the death of meritocracy

#16
post #11

> This is how it works: someone working at facebook is taking bribes in exchange for the blue mark, a middle man will take your money (anywhere between $1000 and $15000 dollars, depending on your stupidity) and the friend at fb will submit an application for you to be verified. Hopefully it will be approved. This is interesting if true

Those seem like really low figures for bribes considering the average salary of a facebook employee.

If your expenses equal or exceed your income, even at Facebook salary, an extra $3,000 can be crucial to keeping up the appearance of financial success.

Re: An epidemic of fake influencers and the death of meritocracy

#17
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those seem like really low figures for bribes considering the average salary of a facebook employee.

"someone working at facebook" probably isn't an employee, most likely anything requiring case by case human discretion is a contractor position that pays shit. On the other hand, this seems like a way to legitimately take your instagram career to the next level! Networking is about who you know, not about how many people you know. Knowing a Facebook verification contractor is some pretty ironclad social proof.

Yeah, I was thinking the same: most human-scalable data entry ops, like application review, is farmed out to contractors.

That said, there's no guarantee that the contractor will be assigned your application to review. Assuming there are bribes, it likely would involve multiple people which increases it's chances of being revealed and less likely to actually be happening.

Re: An epidemic of fake influencers and the death of meritocracy

#18

I love how articles like this make all these problems seem brand new. As if scammers never existed before the internet. The internet must be so evil.

They did exist before the internet. But could they reach the masses for so little out of pocket? Could they reach as many so easily? Edit: To a degree, yes. Infomercials were wildly successful. But were there other ways?

Back in ancient times, scammers placed small ads in the back of comic books and computer ad catalogs and gardening magazines and the like. I remember one case where a guy placed an ad that said, "Send $1 to [his P.O. box]" and made some money over the course of a few months before anyone complained. He didn't promise to send anything for the dollar, so iirc he wasn't prosecuted.

Re: An epidemic of fake influencers and the death of meritocracy

#19
What's interesting is that Facebook could easily clamp down on this: they certainly have the tools to monitor their network for "fake" accounts and identify activity by pools.

Why wouldn't they? Are they counting this manufactured engagement in the figures they use to sell advertisements?

Post reply on HN