Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
11–20 of 39 posts
Re: Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
#12Talk about a weak result! They're 95% confident that women with recurrent miscarriages are at least 3% less likely to perform oral sex.
Re: Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
#13And increases chance of oral cancer...
Why is this downvoted? This is both absolutely true and incredibly important. It's literally a matter of life and death. edit: If you are downvoting this as an emotional reaction to something you haven't considered before, please consider calming down and examining the evidence with a rational mind. Your health and that of the people you love are at risk.
Re: Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
#14Re: Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
#15Isn’t that just a correlation that they discovered? Aren’t there thousands of hidden variables that could explain this correlation without a causal relationship? Isn’t that a pretty weak p Value ? I just read the abstract and might have mis-interpreted it. But on a first glance this looks like an April fools joke.
Re: Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why is this downvoted? This is both absolutely true and incredibly important. It's literally a matter of life and death. edit: If you are downvoting this as an emotional reaction to something you haven't considered before, please consider calming down and examining the evidence with a rational mind. Your health and that of the people you love are at risk.
If you are worried about it get the Gardasil vaccine. It is 600$ in my country and I got it out of pocket because I think it's a great idea for anyone mildly active sexually.
Re: Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
#17While this is a very interesting finding, I suspect p-hacking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_dredging Imagine the awkwardness when someone tries to get funding to confirm.
In this particular case they seem to have a clear hypothesis on why there could be a strong link between one and the other: > "Oral sex might induce maternal tolerance towards paternal antigens of the fetus".
Anyway. This doesn't mean that this is a strong study. Just pointing out that at least they seem to have a theory on why oral sex can protect against miscarriages.
Re: Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
#18> via seminal fluid to oral mucosa To these people, 'oral sex' seems to mean implicitly mean a female giving and a male receiving. Typical.
Re: Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
#19Isn’t that just a correlation that they discovered? Aren’t there thousands of hidden variables that could explain this correlation without a causal relationship? Isn’t that a pretty weak p Value ? I just read the abstract and might have mis-interpreted it. But on a first glance this looks like an April fools joke.
Re: Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage
#20While this is a very interesting finding, I suspect p-hacking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_dredging Imagine the awkwardness when someone tries to get funding to confirm.
Data dredging is usually establishing a causation or pattern of two loosely correlated variables with no clear undesrstanding of why one have effects on the other. (correlation != causation). In this particular case they seem to have a clear hypothesis on why there could be a strong link between one and the other: > "Oral sex might induce maternal tolerance towards paternal antigens of the fetus". Anyway. This doesn'…