Live data from Hacker News

Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty

citylab.com

11–20 of 332 posts

Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty

#14
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why is it a fine? Why not a tax? Fines (at least, non-criminal ones) and taxes, while sometimes procedurally distinct, are essentially functionally equivalent.

In general, taxes are deductible whereas fines are not.

And you usually don’t self-assess fines, but you do self-assess taxes.

Leave the fines for when taxes aren’t self-assessed.

Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty

#15

Why is it a fine? Why not a tax? Taxing unused spaces sitting idle makes a lot more sense than income (ie: people’s work).

Maybe fines offer more discretion for officials (easy to impose, revise, and target specific landlords) as opposed to a tax which would be more rigid (slow to implement, difficult to change)?

is it good that fines allow them to target specific landlords?

Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty

#16
post #3

Why is it a fine? Why not a tax? Taxing unused spaces sitting idle makes a lot more sense than income (ie: people’s work).

> Why is it a fine? Why not a tax? what's the difference?

Traditionally, you only pay a fine if you’re caught.

Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty

#19

Why is it a fine? Why not a tax? Taxing unused spaces sitting idle makes a lot more sense than income (ie: people’s work).

Yeah let's just get rid of income taxes and have an empty-building based economy that makes a lot of sense

Or lower one with the revenue from the other...

I also prefer sales taxes over income taxes with cheques to counter their regressive nature.

And carbon taxes over sales and income taxes. Taxing destruction is a good thing.

Re: Barcelona Fines Landlords Who Let Buildings Sit Empty

#20
post #13

It's kinda easy to make it look like a building is occupied and avoid the fine. It's kinda hard for authorities to prove otherwise.

Sounds more like Vancouver law which really targeted foreign owners who were parking their capital and doing nothing with the property.

At some point, the effort required to cover up the lack of occupancy is equivalent to renting out the place.

Post reply on HN