A big feature conspicuously absent from iOS is a unified documents folder accessible by all apps, and some basic file management capabilities. It would preferably be mounted as a virtual mass storage device when you plug in the USB cable. Here's hoping this'll be one of the features of 5.0.
Things I would love to see in iOS 5
11–20 of 28 posts
Re: Things I would love to see in iOS 5
#12While I see the use of changeable text in icons, like the calendar app employs, why would anyone want to have animated icons? Perhaps it would be an "eye candy" thing to show off with for 10 seconds, but I'm sure it would be annoying in the long run. Any ideas for reasonable uses of animated icons?
Yes, Statsheet was denied putting 345 apps in the store for each college basketball team. If we are only allowed to have one app, then the user could choose which team is theirs, and then the front Icon would change to represent their team.
To OP of this thread: It was another idle comment. The crux of the request was in boldface.
Re: Things I would love to see in iOS 5
#13That the author suggests that, since the iPad has a landscape homescreen, this could just be enabled for iPhone shows a lack of appreciation of Apple's design sensibilities that pervades this article. Just because the iPad has it doesn't mean it doesn't need designing for the iPhone. Furthermore, the iPhone is primarily a portrait device. The iPad, not fitting easily in one hand, is as much a landscape device as it i…
Re: Things I would love to see in iOS 5
#14A big feature conspicuously absent from iOS is a unified documents folder accessible by all apps, and some basic file management capabilities. It would preferably be mounted as a virtual mass storage device when you plug in the USB cable. Here's hoping this'll be one of the features of 5.0.
I think you will see the same thing for many other types of databases, but they will all be dependent on type. The databases already there are music, contacts, notes, PDFs in iBook, epubs in iBooks. I think you'll see the full ability to access and modify those databases, and full cloud syncing of them as well. But, they will still be different and separated by file type or task.
Re: Things I would love to see in iOS 5
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, Statsheet was denied putting 345 apps in the store for each college basketball team. If we are only allowed to have one app, then the user could choose which team is theirs, and then the front Icon would change to represent their team.
A static icon change would achieve the same thing. You don't need animated icons for that. To OP of this thread: It was another idle comment. The crux of the request was in boldface.
A tighter implementation would be a limited amount over overlay that was configurable -- like the alert # but with more control. The important point being that the underlying icon that I scan for still being available.
MacOS uses this in a number of places to identify download, symlinks and the like.
Re: Things I would love to see in iOS 5
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
A unified documents folder just doesn't work as seen on OSX. Most filetypes are bound to a specific application anyway, so there's no point in a cluttered unified folder.
Why would it be cluttered? It could work just like Settings. Apps with their own document type register as such with the OS. The "Documents" app shows a list of those apps and each one leads to a list of documents for that app. From this list, users can open, rename, delete, attach to an email, and so on. Apps would not be allowed to dump internal junk in their document folder, only stuff the user creates and knows e…
Re: Things I would love to see in iOS 5
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, Statsheet was denied putting 345 apps in the store for each college basketball team. If we are only allowed to have one app, then the user could choose which team is theirs, and then the front Icon would change to represent their team.
A static icon change would achieve the same thing. You don't need animated icons for that. To OP of this thread: It was another idle comment. The crux of the request was in boldface.
Re: Things I would love to see in iOS 5
#18Re: Things I would love to see in iOS 5
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would it be cluttered? It could work just like Settings. Apps with their own document type register as such with the OS. The "Documents" app shows a list of those apps and each one leads to a list of documents for that app. From this list, users can open, rename, delete, attach to an email, and so on. Apps would not be allowed to dump internal junk in their document folder, only stuff the user creates and knows e…
If documents are categorised by apps, why have a separate browser for them instead of keeping them in the app? If I want to view my Pages documents, I'd open Pages not Documents or whatever it might be called.p
1. The user can manage all their stuff in one place with consistent functionality across all apps.
2. The OS can implement generic file handling features like search, share, backup, sync, etc.
3. It paves the way for standard file types that can be handled by multiple apps, or apps that can work with any type of file, like Dropbox.
The power of filesystems is well understood and I'm sure Apple could create one instilled with their magical UX and just-worksiness. But they won't do it because I think they are afraid of 3rd party apps becoming too useful. They don't want anyone else creating an ecosystem that they don't control. But Google and RIM are happy to do that and I hope they establish a higher standard of utility that Apple is forced to live up to.