Live data from Hacker News

Senators want potential VPN threat investigated by DHS

searchsecurity.techtarget.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Senators want potential VPN threat investigated by DHS

#11
post #5
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is actually Standard Operating Procedure for Congress. You have a bunch of non-technically literate people in theory delegating the responsibility for educating them to an agency who is responsible for either rounding-up/hiring experts to educate Congress or to collate whatever required reading is necessary. I have difficulty understanding why this type of research isn't done by Congressional research assets tho…

Congress used to do its own research via the Office of Technology Assessment but because the results often contradicted the positions of lobbyists it was eliminated under Gingrich in the mid 1990s. The drug side of the FDA used to have its own research labs but they were eliminated by the same congress because their results constrained and informed the scientific demands they placed on drug development trials. It's n…

That is...incredibly depressing to hear.

How is the legislature supposed to actually hold the Executive and special interests in check then? It sounds like the entire federal government has been neutered in terms of being able to actually do it's own footwork to guard against encroaching agendas..

This actually explains a lot, now that I think about it.

Re: Senators want potential VPN threat investigated by DHS

#12
post #6

Dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19138112 The title is also misleading. The "VPN threat" they're concerned about is not the about VPN's per se, but VPN's that spy on their users. Such things are real, as was recently made clear when Apple revoked Facebook's enterprise certificate over one.

if you're an analyst, and someone voluntarily lets you into their house knowing you're there to collect information about their house, are you spying? doesn't spying require some element of attempted secrecy?

Burying the spying disclosure in the TOS, and obfuscating the language used to describe that spying, is attempted secrecy. Also, it’s irrelevant, because disclosure of potentially illegal acts doesn’t make them any more legal (“but I told them I was going to steal their money, and they put it in my safe anyway” is not a legal defense).

Re: Senators want potential VPN threat investigated by DHS

#13
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

if you're an analyst, and someone voluntarily lets you into their house knowing you're there to collect information about their house, are you spying? doesn't spying require some element of attempted secrecy?

Burying the spying disclosure in the TOS, and obfuscating the language used to describe that spying, is attempted secrecy. Also, it’s irrelevant, because disclosure of potentially illegal acts doesn’t make them any more legal (“but I told them I was going to steal their money, and they put it in my safe anyway” is not a legal defense).

[deleted]
Post reply on HN