The Case for Transmissible Alzheimer's Grows
11–20 of 133 posts
Re: The Case for Transmissible Alzheimer's Grows
#12Just a clarifying point from the article: Transmissible != Communicable. Still, it makes me wonder what sort of other spooky “life forms” we can host.
Re: The Case for Transmissible Alzheimer's Grows
#13Dumb question (Wikipedia was of no help), if amyloid beta looks and acts like a prion, why isn't it classified as a prion?
Re: The Case for Transmissible Alzheimer's Grows
#14Just a clarifying point from the article: Transmissible != Communicable. Still, it makes me wonder what sort of other spooky “life forms” we can host.
If evidence of transmission between people comes forward, the sociological implications will mean decades of debate. Im not going to fault anyone for taking a keen interest in this area. They are opening a pandora's box.
Re: The Case for Transmissible Alzheimer's Grows
#15Just a clarifying point from the article: Transmissible != Communicable. Still, it makes me wonder what sort of other spooky “life forms” we can host.
(1) thanks for clarifying, that's a relief. (2) what does transmissible mean, then?
“It is important – imperative – to emphasize that transmissible does not equal contagious. There is absolutely no evidence that people with dementia can spread their disease casually to people around them. Even donated blood appears to be safe, as no association with blood transfusions and Alzheimer’s Disease has ever been detected.”
Re: The Case for Transmissible Alzheimer's Grows
#16Dumb question (Wikipedia was of no help), if amyloid beta looks and acts like a prion, why isn't it classified as a prion?
What is the difference between amyloid and prions? Are they part of a spectrum? Are they one in the same? If not, what is the difference? Can what we’ve learned about the biology of prions help our efforts to fight amyloid dementias?
Re: The Case for Transmissible Alzheimer's Grows
#17Just a clarifying point from the article: Transmissible != Communicable. Still, it makes me wonder what sort of other spooky “life forms” we can host.
It also doesn’t mean it’s not communicable or contagious, it means we don’t know because it seems no one have looked yet [1]
[0] It is important – imperative – to emphasize that transmissible does not equal contagious. There is absolutely no evidence that people with dementia can spread their disease casually to people around them.
[1] Since Alzheimer’s Disease is so common, and we have not (to my knowledge) been looking for Alzheimer's caused by surgical or other medical procedures that access eye or neural tissue -- particularly in patients for whom the appearance of Alzheimer’s would not be surprising -- is it possible that we are underestimating the transmission potential of this disease, and that such events are less rare than we would guess?
Re: The Case for Transmissible Alzheimer's Grows
#18Or are they competing hypotheses?
reported here in January: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18987015