Earlier quoted context omitted.
Curious, how long is it until it's okay to post a duplicate?
I think 1 year is reasonable, that guy is a dick
Or, ya know, it's kind of normal around here to link to previous discussions.
Explain shell
11–20 of 56 posts
Re: Explain shell
#12Re: Explain shell
#13Can’t view the page on iPhone 6 and safari. Doesn’t let you zoom out to see the whole page at once.
I'm surprised that some sites just don't load on a 5 year old environment while providing nothing more valuable than sites from 15 years ago. Frameworks just need to do better.
Re: Explain shell
#14There's also https://www.shellcheck.net/
Re: Explain shell
#15Can’t view the page on iPhone 6 and safari. Doesn’t let you zoom out to see the whole page at once.
I'm surprised that some sites just don't load on a 5 year old environment while providing nothing more valuable than sites from 15 years ago. Frameworks just need to do better.
Which 15-year-old site is this one equivalent to?
Re: Explain shell
#16A command line version would be great.
Re: Explain shell
#17https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6834791
Curious, how long is it until it's okay to post a duplicate?
That's a frequently asked question!
Re: Explain shell
#18https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6834791
Yup and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13989215, from 2017.
Re: Explain shell
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Curious, how long is it until it's okay to post a duplicate?
I think 1 year is reasonable, that guy is a dick
No no, it's customary on HN to link to previous discussions because they're interesting to look at! Linking to a previous submission with no comments is frowned upon, but a big past discussion is a generous offer.
People sometimes think we (moderators) are being jerks when we post such links as well. I'm a bit puzzled about what to do about that. It's tedious to post "because it might be interesting" every time.
(p.s. I get that your positive intention was to support the submitter of the article. But on HN, please express your positive intentions more directly. That user wasn't a dick, and it sucks to come to the internet and see oneself described that way.)
Re: Explain shell
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm surprised that some sites just don't load on a 5 year old environment while providing nothing more valuable than sites from 15 years ago. Frameworks just need to do better.
Which 15-year-old site is this one equivalent to?
I suspect that GP is referring to layout and formatting, not content.