Modern Robotics: Mechanics, Planning, and Control – Free Textbook (2017)

You have to study quite a lot of linear algebra before you can tackle functional analysis, the subject which includes the study of topological vector spaces. I don't know anything about robotics, however, so I don't know how functional analysis would apply, if at all.

Whilst this is interesting, this isn't where the field is going. This is useful if, say, you want to make a CNC robot with extreme rigidity.

Replacing forward and inverse kinematics with machine learning is extremely simple, and avoids most of the problems these formulas have (for instance, they don't consider that a robot might attempt to move through itself). And while grasping and manipulation isn't simple even with machine learning, I think you'll agree that the theory in these books also very, very much isn't simple.

And the problem is that the current capabilities of robots using these formulas from books like these ... are insufficient. They need to become WAY more complex to be useful, but that's impossible: they're already damned complicated.

The outlook very much is that the only way we'll ever arrive at the required complexity for these machines is through machine learning, and if not that, then through some form of automated program writing. A human just cannot write safe and working code that deals with robots in open settings and/or where interactions might occur.

You should probably still learn the very basic parts. Chapter 9 and 11. But after that, you will likely get further with machine learning.

There is another Coursera class for aerial applications. Course 1 of the Penn State specialization:

https://www.coursera.org/specializations/robotics

You can go a long long way with what's in this book. Think of factory robots, medical robotics, cruise control, aircraft components, etc. Just because it can't handle a robot octopus doesn't mean it's pointless.

I have seen this so often, this top-down approach. And it never arrives at the factory floor. All those object orientated, industry 4.0 robots, they looks so nice to the professionals on trade-shows, and then there is one example bought- and put to all the other show-off-proto-types in the company-tour room of archievments- and on the factory floor we use the same old robots, for which all the legacy software was written - that nobody can ditch anymore.

And none of those high flying concepts ever talk about those maintaining the robots. Those who never attended High School, who are okay with a 9000 line copy pasted Procedural program, and not okay with object orientation or even functional programing style.

Im so sick of all that wasted time in startups, where people like me fresh from university develop - new, idea robots, who will never take hold in a actual factory- because none of those revoluzzers wants to spend all its time in that factory, maintaining the robot- beeing the only one competent enough todo so.

Sorry if this is a rant, but i wish for once that economic reality would nuke some sense into the architects of that tomorrow that never comes. Maybee we could have small, nice things, if we where willing to do the little steps.