Live data from Hacker News

Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine (1989)

longnow.org

11–20 of 35 posts

Re: Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine (1989)

#11
Feynman is one of the few dead people I wish I could have had many conversations with while on a long hike.

His talk describing computers to a lay audience at the Esalen Institute [1] is my goto resource whenever someone asks me how computers work. It's from the same era as the referenced article, he's even wearing the same Thinking Machines shirt.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKWGGDXe5MA

Re: Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine (1989)

#13
This is probably the most important habit of Feynman, I tried to incorporate into my own life and studying:

"Then he would set to work, scribbling on a pad of paper and staring at the results. While he was in the middle of this kind of puzzle solving he was impossible to interrupt. "Don't bug me. I'm busy," he would say without even looking up. Eventually he would either decide the problem was too hard (in which case he lost interest), or he would find a solution (in which case he spent the next day or two explaining it to anyone who listened). In this way he worked on problems in database searches, geophysical modeling, protein folding, analyzing images, and reading insurance forms."

Re: Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine (1989)

#14

I'm glad this was posted despite being perennial -- it's the first time I've read it. Does anyone have any similar "classic" Feynman stories to share?

He wrote a few books of reminiscences which are full of them, great reads.

But this was the first time I've seen his...extremely ugly sexist behaviour displayed, not just hinted about. Very odd. In his books he's just a bit of a ladies man.

Re: Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine (1989)

#15

I'm glad this was posted despite being perennial -- it's the first time I've read it. Does anyone have any similar "classic" Feynman stories to share?

He wrote a few books of reminiscences which are full of them, great reads. But this was the first time I've seen his...extremely ugly sexist behaviour displayed, not just hinted about. Very odd. In his books he's just a bit of a ladies man.

James Gleick's biography of Feynman, Genius, is a good read and complements the books Feynman wrote himself.

> first time I've seen his...extremely ugly sexist behaviour displayed

Not to excuse it, but he was the product of a different time.

Re: Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine (1989)

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He wrote a few books of reminiscences which are full of them, great reads. But this was the first time I've seen his...extremely ugly sexist behaviour displayed, not just hinted about. Very odd. In his books he's just a bit of a ladies man.

James Gleick's biography of Feynman, Genius , is a good read and complements the books Feynman wrote himself. > first time I've seen his...extremely ugly sexist behaviour displayed Not to excuse it, but he was the product of a different time.

Well, why say that? Of course it's an attempt at excusing it. I almost included a sentence saying "Yes, he was a product of an earlier time, but (civilized) people didn't go around treating women like that then any more than they do nowadays, i.e. not at all."

Re: Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine (1989)

#17

I'm glad this was posted despite being perennial -- it's the first time I've read it. Does anyone have any similar "classic" Feynman stories to share?

He wrote a few books of reminiscences which are full of them, great reads. But this was the first time I've seen his...extremely ugly sexist behaviour displayed, not just hinted about. Very odd. In his books he's just a bit of a ladies man.

What am I being downvoted for here exactly, downvoters?[0] Do people think the behaviour mentioned is at all acceptable?! Or that 'extremely ugly sexist behaviour' isn't a fair characterization? I can't see what else in what I said could cause offence. We are talking about Feynman, who believed in speaking the plain truth, pretty or not. And that story is just very creepy:

"in many ways Richard was a sexist. Whenever it came time for his daily bowl of soup he would look around for the nearest "girl" and ask if she would fetch it to him. It did not matter if she was the cook, an engineer, or the president of the company. I once asked a female engineer who had just been a victim of this if it bothered her. "Yes, it really annoys me," she said."

[0] Sorry to mention it, but this doesn't seem quite the standard case.

Re: Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine (1989)

#19
A very entertaining and informative essay.

Could perhaps someone try to elaborate on the calculation of buffers needed per chip?

Quote: To a physicist this may seem natural, but to a computer designer, treating a set of boolean circuits as a continuous, differentiable system is a bit strange. Feynman's router equations were in terms of variables representing continuous quantities such as "the average number of 1 bits in a message address." I was much more accustomed to seeing analysis in terms of inductive proof and case analysis than taking the derivative of "the number of 1's" with respect to time.

How did he do it, conceptionally, and in practice?

Re: Richard Feynman and the Connection Machine (1989)

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

James Gleick's biography of Feynman, Genius , is a good read and complements the books Feynman wrote himself. > first time I've seen his...extremely ugly sexist behaviour displayed Not to excuse it, but he was the product of a different time.

Well, why say that? Of course it's an attempt at excusing it. I almost included a sentence saying "Yes, he was a product of an earlier time, but (civilized) people didn't go around treating women like that then any more than they do nowadays, i.e. not at all."

We look up to historical figures who owned slaves. There were people who were morally opposed to slavery back then as well.

The fact is, people who accomplished great things also engaged in morally questionable stuff as well. If we try to erase all of these figures from our history books, they'll end up empty. We have to accept that social mores fluctuate over the generations and read history with the appropriate perspective.

Post reply on HN