Live data from Hacker News

GAB.AI is offline

gab.ai

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: GAB.AI is offline

#11
post #9

Judging a group by a subset of their membership is a bad idea. We "got it" with racism and sexism and stereotyping... but it appears we still haven't quite "got it". If some posts on gab are direct incitement of violence, they should (and as I have heard, do) get removed. Trashing the entire service is IMHO something else entirely. If a legal activity (gab acts entirely above board) simply cannot operate, not for lac…

Gab's own (verified) Twitter account posts anti-Semitic slurs and retweets white supremacist garbage. They openly court white nationalists. They've since tried to delete posts, but, of course, many of them have been screenshot. They don't even have the courage of their own convictions. The idea that they just happen to have had some nasty users is a scam that they're trying to get the rest of the world to buy into. A…

If what you say is true, then I was ignorant and I apologise for that. I suppose judging them for them is just fine. But I stand by the rest of my comment.

"Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, though not usually upheld by such extreme penalties, it leaves fewer means of escape, penetrating much more deeply into the details of life, and enslaving the soul itself." - John Stewart Mill (in On Liberty)

Re: GAB.AI is offline

#12
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Gab's own (verified) Twitter account posts anti-Semitic slurs and retweets white supremacist garbage. They openly court white nationalists. They've since tried to delete posts, but, of course, many of them have been screenshot. They don't even have the courage of their own convictions. The idea that they just happen to have had some nasty users is a scam that they're trying to get the rest of the world to buy into. A…

If what you say is true, then I was ignorant and I apologise for that. I suppose judging them for them is just fine. But I stand by the rest of my comment. "Society can and does execute its own mandates: and if it issues wrong mandates instead of right, or any mandates at all in things with which it ought not to meddle, it practices a social tyranny more formidable than many kinds of political oppression, since, thou…

No apology needed! I understand how attractive the argument Gab is making is. That's why they're making it. There's no reason you should have had to be vigilant about this bunch of evil randos. I appreciate you taking a beat to listen.
Post reply on HN