Honest question: Why not bundle Tor, instead of relying on a proprietary VPN service? It seems that Tor satisfies the advertised use case ("insecure public WiFi") just as well.
Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
11–20 of 95 posts
Re: Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
#12Why is the price $10/month when you can buy the same service directly from ProtonVPN for $8/month?
Re: Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
#13Re: Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
#14Honest question: Why not bundle Tor, instead of relying on a proprietary VPN service? It seems that Tor satisfies the advertised use case ("insecure public WiFi") just as well.
Re: Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
#15(disclaimer I guess I own a company that offers VPN services, it's like ~1% of revenue though). I think this seems like a bit much. I'd love Firefox to double down on building a great browser, rather than getting into Pocket, VPN, a Phone, IOT, etc. Sure, a VPN can be really helpful when you're on sketchy open wifi, or other adversarial network conditions. But you're still trusting someone to handle your connections…
>But do we really expect VPN providers to not crunch the same numbers and come to the same conclusions? Yes, because those numbers are different -- there's actual competition among the providers, which is not so for ISPs. I agree it's still a gamble, and still requires trust, but if/when that trust is broken, there's someone else ready to fill that void.
This puts them in the same boat as say, IKEA.
Re: Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
>But do we really expect VPN providers to not crunch the same numbers and come to the same conclusions? Yes, because those numbers are different -- there's actual competition among the providers, which is not so for ISPs. I agree it's still a gamble, and still requires trust, but if/when that trust is broken, there's someone else ready to fill that void.
Make no mistake, Mozilla Corporation is a for-profit entity. They're owned by a nonprofit shell, but I imagine that nonprofit could easily sell them off. This puts them in the same boat as say, IKEA.
https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/16/16784628/mozilla-mr-robo...
Re: Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
#17Honest question: Why not bundle Tor, instead of relying on a proprietary VPN service? It seems that Tor satisfies the advertised use case ("insecure public WiFi") just as well.
It's not ideal though. A large fraction of the web blocks access from Tor relays, or makes you jump through extra hoops, like completing onerous captchas. It's not a great experience.
Re: Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
#18Honest question: Why not bundle Tor, instead of relying on a proprietary VPN service? It seems that Tor satisfies the advertised use case ("insecure public WiFi") just as well.
Tor and Firefox are working together to make Tor network the default within private browsing mode. A number of privacy-related patches from Tor have already landed in Firefox (example: Firefox now has first-party isolation). It's a slow progress, but it's on its way.
If you're interested about more, the project is called Project Fusion: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Fusion
There was a discussion here a few months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17205441
Re: Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
#19Honest question: Why not bundle Tor, instead of relying on a proprietary VPN service? It seems that Tor satisfies the advertised use case ("insecure public WiFi") just as well.
Re: Mozilla Announces Experimental Partnership with ProtonVPN
#20i would not have minded if mozilla had offered their own vpn service, trusting some third party sounds like a bad idea.