Live data from Hacker News

What we lose by reading 100,000 words every day

washingtonpost.com

11–20 of 113 posts

Re: What we lose by reading 100,000 words every day

#11
post #4

the average person “consumes about 34 gigabytes across varied devices each day” — some 100,000 words’ worth of information - seems like an odd and misleading statistic.

Especially when we consider that the computer is the one consuming bytes. English's information entropy per character is quite low, & we consume text, not bytes

https://cs.fit.edu/~mmahoney/dissertation/entropy1.html

Re: What we lose by reading 100,000 words every day

#12
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s also demonstratively untrue. 100,000 words is, by itself almost certainly under a megabyte. (Avg word length (let’s say 6) * number of words = number of bytes) If you count -everything- then you’re basically insinuating that people on data caps are either consuming less (and because it’s an average, everyone else consumes much more) or outright claiming that you can quantify data that is consumed outside of a co…

Agree. Also, even watching videos for 24 hours it seems unlikely that you'd go through 34GB worth. Maybe the size of video files has gone way up since I was a movie downloader, but 12 2 hour movies is probably < 34GB..

As a point of interest, there are audio- and cinephiles who prefer 10bit color depth, 5.1 FLAC audio. I'm not one of them, but I stumble across their files sometimes, and I have seen stuff like Blade Runner (~2h run time) to the tune of 20-30GB (IIRC).

Re: What we lose by reading 100,000 words every day

#15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Agree. Also, even watching videos for 24 hours it seems unlikely that you'd go through 34GB worth. Maybe the size of video files has gone way up since I was a movie downloader, but 12 2 hour movies is probably < 34GB..

As a point of interest, there are audio- and cinephiles who prefer 10bit color depth, 5.1 FLAC audio. I'm not one of them, but I stumble across their files sometimes, and I have seen stuff like Blade Runner (~2h run time) to the tune of 20-30GB (IIRC).

10bit h.264 was actually introduced as a way to reduce file size. I'm not familiar with the details, but apparently it reduces noise in the compression algorithm.

Re: What we lose by reading 100,000 words every day

#16
post #4

the average person “consumes about 34 gigabytes across varied devices each day” — some 100,000 words’ worth of information - seems like an odd and misleading statistic.

It might be accurate if you include every tracker on every article page. If that still doesn't get you there, you can pad it out with youtube and netflix.

Re: What we lose by reading 100,000 words every day

#18
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s also demonstratively untrue. 100,000 words is, by itself almost certainly under a megabyte. (Avg word length (let’s say 6) * number of words = number of bytes) If you count -everything- then you’re basically insinuating that people on data caps are either consuming less (and because it’s an average, everyone else consumes much more) or outright claiming that you can quantify data that is consumed outside of a co…

Agree. Also, even watching videos for 24 hours it seems unlikely that you'd go through 34GB worth. Maybe the size of video files has gone way up since I was a movie downloader, but 12 2 hour movies is probably < 34GB..

a blu-ray rip with no reencode can easily be 20-30GB. even the higher bitrate 1080p encodes found on public trackers can be 8-12GB. pretty easy to go through 34GB of high quality 1080p movies on a domestic plane flight (if you have the storage).

Re: What we lose by reading 100,000 words every day

#19
post #16
post #4

the average person “consumes about 34 gigabytes across varied devices each day” — some 100,000 words’ worth of information - seems like an odd and misleading statistic.

It might be accurate if you include every tracker on every article page. If that still doesn't get you there, you can pad it out with youtube and netflix.

And it's not at all clear what "consumes" means here.

If I flick through a news feed of some kind, skimming for headlines that might interest me, am I "consuming" every image and video that scrolls past?

I clicked the link but didn't read the article; have I "consumed" it?

Post reply on HN