Live data from Hacker News

Apple Is Secretly Giving People 'Trust Scores' Based on Their Iphone Data

independent.co.uk

11–16 of 16 posts

Re: Apple Is Secretly Giving People 'Trust Scores' Based on Their Iphone Data

#11

I'm confused by the headline. The quote from Apple is that they're computing trust scores for your devices for when you attempt a purchase. It sounds like the more you use the device, the more trusted it is. That brand new device that you've never used before shouldn't be trusted. What I don't understand is how you can reasonably stretch that out to giving people trust scores. Click bait?

Right. The point is to detect fraudulent purchases made in someone else's name. It wouldn't even make sense to associate this rating with the user.

Re: Apple Is Secretly Giving People 'Trust Scores' Based on Their Iphone Data

#12
post #10
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By not buying and not using their services.

How can I not use either Android or iOS? I'm not well versed in data protection policies, but at least in the EU where I live, shouldn't this fall under GDPR? I should be able to opt out of having my personal data to be used by a algorithm to determine my "trust score", whatever that means.

Well I have bad news: every purchase from every merchant is assigned a trust score. Obviously online merchants have fraud detection.

Re: Apple Is Secretly Giving People 'Trust Scores' Based on Their Iphone Data

#13
post #3
post #2

This is not like the Black Mirror episode, Nosedive (or a similar episode of the Orville), because people aren’t rating others and scores aren’t known at all. The behavior changes from constantly rating and being rated by lots of subjective raters is what scared me in the episode. This is similar to other risk or trust algorithm used by banks, healthcare, ctrfit agencies, email services, etc. It could be bad dependin…

Yes, the comparison with the episode looks unreasonable. Still, it sounds that Apple processes personal data without any possibility to opt-out.

There's an obvious problem with enabling people to opt-out of fraud detection. But I suppose Apple could offer other ways to confirm your identity, e.g. 2FA.

Re: Apple Is Secretly Giving People 'Trust Scores' Based on Their Iphone Data

#15
How many phone calls / email does one send to be deemed trustworthy?

And on top of that, considering I make ‘phone calls’ via signal, FaceTime (audio) and other apps, on top of the standard dialer, and for email use Zoho, inbox, gmail and the standard client, how does it even come up with these numbers?

I have to assume they’re looking for extremely high usage, robo dialers or spam outfits using iPhones. But is there any evidence this is happening?

It also sounds like it’s somehow connected to Apple Pay, but why would someone using their device for spam purposes have or setup Apple Pay? Surely if you’re using your device to robo dial / spam, it’s one of many devices sitting in a rack / pseudo data centre. Not a personal device.

This all sounds very very strange.

Re: Apple Is Secretly Giving People 'Trust Scores' Based on Their Iphone Data

#16
post #6

I'm confused by the headline. The quote from Apple is that they're computing trust scores for your devices for when you attempt a purchase. It sounds like the more you use the device, the more trusted it is. That brand new device that you've never used before shouldn't be trusted. What I don't understand is how you can reasonably stretch that out to giving people trust scores. Click bait?

>>It sounds like the more you use the device, the more trusted it is. Where did you see it? It says nothing about how the score is calculated.

"To help identify and prevent fraud, information about how you use your device, including the approximate number of phone calls or emails you send and receive, will be used to compute a device trust score when you attempt a purchase," the page reads.

See the "information about how you use your device, including the approximate number of phone calls or emails you send and receive".

So the score calculation for that device includes the approximate number of phone calls or emails you send and receive on it.

You could interpret that as "the more personal activity you have on a device, the less trusted it should be", but that makes no sense. The more you use a device, the more likely it is to actually be your device.

It makes sense to place less trust in devices that you rarely use.

Post reply on HN