Live data from Hacker News

Alleged AMD EPYC ‘Rome’ 7nm Based 64 Core Processor Performance Leaks Out

wccftech.com

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: Alleged AMD EPYC ‘Rome’ 7nm Based 64 Core Processor Performance Leaks Out

#11

We already saw that the Threadripper 2990 is starved for bandwidth between Zen packages due to the infinity fabric design. So you get incredible cinebench performance (and some other 'embarrassingly parallel' workloads), but it doesn't scale to other kinds of programs that have more interthread/interprocess communication. I guess it remains to be seen what happens with EPYC, but my initial guess is that it will have…

Yes, infinity fabric has limitations. Threadripper suffers in memory intensive workloads because only half of the CCXs have a dedicated memory controller thus some cores need to talk to another CCX to access memory. On EPYC each CCX has its own memory controller so it's less of an issue.

Re: Alleged AMD EPYC ‘Rome’ 7nm Based 64 Core Processor Performance Leaks Out

#12
post #2

Anyone here familiar with overall performance / server costs to give an insight if AMD might actually become competitive considering with all the hype around AMD these days, I have still yet to see any of the 3 major providers offer an AMD chip?

I don't know about offering the latest chips, but Dell and HP at least, have offered AMD based servers for many years now...?
Post reply on HN