Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Not enough people are paying attention to this economic trend

gatesnotes.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–17 of 17 posts

Re: Not enough people are paying attention to this economic trend

#11

Post by DoofusOfDeath »

piker wrote: post #6
jackconnor wrote: post #2

The Secret Economic Trend the Celebritites Use to Stay Thin! (this link-baity title is beneath HN, c'mon)

The author is Bill Gates. He's earned deference on title drafting from the HN crowd.

Hopefully the HN crowd doesn't readily accept appeal-to-authority logic.

And even if they were, I'm not sure most of is would be aware that "(gatesnotes.com)" indicated that Bill Gates is the author.

A less problematic wording for the story might be:

Bill Gates: Not enough people are paying attention to this economic trend

Re: Not enough people are paying attention to this economic trend

#13

Post by piker »

DoofusOfDeath wrote: post #11
piker wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The author is Bill Gates. He's earned deference on title drafting from the HN crowd.

Hopefully the HN crowd doesn't readily accept appeal-to-authority logic. And even if they were, I'm not sure most of is would be aware that "(gatesnotes.com)" indicated that Bill Gates is the author. A less problematic wording for the story might be: Bill Gates: Not enough people are paying attention to this economic trend

This does not advocate the truth of the author's proposition by appeal to his credentials, only refutes the shallow, reflexive "this is clickbait, why is it posted on HN" comment. The answer: it was written by Microsoft founder Bill Gates.

Re: Not enough people are paying attention to this economic trend

#14

Post by rapnie »

DoofusOfDeath wrote: post #8
Analemma_ wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll be sure to let Bill Gates know you disapprove of his blog titles, next time we're hanging out.

Based on currently wide-spread practices, IMO it's quite reasonable to assume that this is click-bait verbiage, not the title of a post from a well-known author. Because of that, I think it would make sense to find different wording for the HN title.

I've seen so many of these kinds of titles and notice that they now have the opposite effect on me. They create an unconscious 'click aversion'. I usually just skip over them automatically. But it was the 9 upvotes and 8 comments in [new] category that drew me in :)

Re: Not enough people are paying attention to this economic trend

#15

Post by nokk »

paulpauper wrote: post #9

He's pretty much describing why Microsoft has been a great investment That's why large information technology companies have profit margins of 20+% and seem immune to business cycles and macro factors. They just keep printing cash even as other sectors ebb and flow. Microsoft, google, facebook, have huge profit margins and have been good investments. It’s a sunk cost. If your investment doesn’t pan out, you don’t hav…

Intellectual property grants companies essential monopolies over what they create as well as lets them pay very low taxes. No wonder they are doing well.

The trillion dollar question is what is going to happen in the long run. We know that prosperity is largely a factor of how well you spread technology and wealth. Which I don't think many countries, other than arguably China, manages to do when it comes to intellectual property.

And if the last half century was infrastructure and industry this half century is information and intellectual property. So it is essential to get this right since it might determine whether you get to be Norway or Thailand in the next century.

Re: Not enough people are paying attention to this economic trend

#17

Post by newscracker »

samspenc wrote: post #4

TL;DR: Bill Gates reviews one of his new favorite books, "Capitalism Without Capital". The book extends economic principles to measure value of intangible goods (such as software and online services), which were previously not correctly incorporated in economic models.

Thanks for the TL;DR. I came here just to get this since the title clearly seemed to be click-bait, and I’m conscious not to give more clicks/attention to such things and make the author believe they should produce more of such titles.
Post reply on HN