11–20 of 137 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They have to ask me if they can use it and for what purpose. And even better, they can’t condition the use of the site/product on me accepting that they sell it.
That sounds good. How is it enforced? ( not being sarcastic )
It's kind of weird (and worrying tbh) that the user doesn't get _all_ the data by default. Shouldn't all the data be sent upon request, is there a clause saying 'only after nagging the TRUE data will be sent?
Meh you are the product spotify is free!
What grand times we live in, where you can actually get this kind of data from the services that you use. Having the law say your personal data is owned by you and not some company just because it's on their server may turn out to be a landmark in consumer friendly legislation!
Interesting. Can they still sell it if it's owned by you? They are collecting and storing it, for sure. What limitations do they have from there? Also, how would the government patrol this without having access to all companies databases, servers, and policies?
As in many other cases you assume the companies are not doing illegal stuff and you act when someone reports them. A developer that is asked to do something illegal like hiding something from the exported data can report it .
"They even store the brand of headphone I use. How do you even get that data, digging deep in CoreBluetooth?"
What grand times we live in, where you can actually get this kind of data from the services that you use. Having the law say your personal data is owned by you and not some company just because it's on their server may turn out to be a landmark in consumer friendly legislation!
Nothing is as simple as a quip can make it sound.
What grand times we live in, where you can actually get this kind of data from the services that you use. Having the law say your personal data is owned by you and not some company just because it's on their server may turn out to be a landmark in consumer friendly legislation!
I don't think everyone agrees people have the right to claim ownership to all data exchanged in a multi-party interaction. Further I don't think anyone understands Identity well enough to be able to provide transitively collected data without breaching confidence of similar third-parties. Nothing is as simple as a quip can make it sound.
Would you be willing to unpack this statement a bit, please? I'm not quite sure I understand.
Seems like CSV would've been a better format than JSON for this type of data based on the screenshots.