Live data from Hacker News

Why Is USA Different?

overcomingbias.com

11–19 of 19 posts

Re: Why Is USA Different?

#12

> ... Americans having the world’s highest worker productivity. Is that valid? Here I can see something different http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OECD_Productivity_levels_2... Although there probably is some measure of worker productivity that US ranks best.

I'm guessing if you change the measure from GDP pr. hour worked to GDP per year employed the US will do a lot better. Mainly since people in US tend to work not only more hours pr day, but also more days pr year.

Re: Why Is USA Different?

#13
post #7

We speculate that in the context of mobile, meritocratic societies, cultural evolutionary processes rooted in our evolved tendencies to imitate successful and prestigious individuals will favor the spread of child-rearing traits that speed up and enhance the development of those particular cognitive and social skills that eventually translate into social and economic success in these populations. I'm so thankful that…

That's some crafty crappifying. It took me quite some time to translate it back to

We speculate that "survival of the fittest" applies to people.

Re: Why Is USA Different?

#14
> In contrast to other large Western industrialized societies, the United States had the highest crime rate, the longest working hours, the highest divorce rate, the highest rate of volunteerism, the highest percentage of citizens with a post-secondary education, the highest productivity rate, the highest GDP, the highest poverty rate, and the highest income-inequality rate; and Americans were the least supportive of various governmental interventions

Perhaps part of the reason the USA is a statistical outlier among WIERD societies is simply its size. It has by fa the biggest population of any WIERD country. This means that most of its cultural influences come from within the country, whereas for a smaller country, a larger proportion of its cultural influences come from outside it -- meaning that smaller countries are less likely to be outliers.

Re: Why Is USA Different?

#15
post #13
post #7

We speculate that in the context of mobile, meritocratic societies, cultural evolutionary processes rooted in our evolved tendencies to imitate successful and prestigious individuals will favor the spread of child-rearing traits that speed up and enhance the development of those particular cognitive and social skills that eventually translate into social and economic success in these populations. I'm so thankful that…

That's some crafty crappifying. It took me quite some time to translate it back to We speculate that "survival of the fittest" applies to people.

Well, not quite. I don't think the conclusion applies at the scope of individual people. I think it's saying either that

A) Successful behavioral patterns will flourish (which is what Hayek says in The Fatal Conceit, and also reminds me of the ideas of The Selfish Gene); or

B) Societies that display successful behavioral patterns will themselves flourish.

(or both, of course)

Re: Why Is USA Different?

#16
post #13
post #7

We speculate that in the context of mobile, meritocratic societies, cultural evolutionary processes rooted in our evolved tendencies to imitate successful and prestigious individuals will favor the spread of child-rearing traits that speed up and enhance the development of those particular cognitive and social skills that eventually translate into social and economic success in these populations. I'm so thankful that…

That's some crafty crappifying. It took me quite some time to translate it back to We speculate that "survival of the fittest" applies to people.

People's behavior evolves (independent of people's genetics) to suit the surrounding culture, in cultures that permit people to adopt and benefit from new behaviors (I suppose as opposed to formally stratified cultures that would just beat you down for trying to leave / rise above your station).

Re: Why Is USA Different?

#17
post #4

Narcissism of small differences. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism_of_small_differences

In most any not-too-big group, and a nearly infinite set of dimensional data to compare, shouldn't one be able to come up with a list of dimensions for each specimen (i.e., country in this example) in which that specimen exceptional in some statistical analysis?

Re: Why Is USA Different?

#18

> ... Americans having the world’s highest worker productivity. Is that valid? Here I can see something different http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:OECD_Productivity_levels_2... Although there probably is some measure of worker productivity that US ranks best.

I don't think that is PPP-adjusted. Adjusted for PPP, only Ireland, Luxemborg and New Zealand have higher productivity than the US.

http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=LEVEL

(Most the top countries on Wikipedia's chart have a high cost of living. A burger might cost $8 in France compared to $5 in Ireland, but that doesn't make a French burger flipper more productive than an Irish one.)

Re: Why Is USA Different?

#19

> In contrast to other large Western industrialized societies, the United States had the highest crime rate, the longest working hours, the highest divorce rate, the highest rate of volunteerism, the highest percentage of citizens with a post-secondary education, the highest productivity rate, the highest GDP, the highest poverty rate, and the highest income-inequality rate; and Americans were the least supportive of…

The law of large numbers says that larger samplings should be MORE uniform rather than LESS; you've got it exactly backwards.
Post reply on HN