I'm interested to see how they go about filtering VPN traffic. AFAIK, running openvpn over port 443 is pretty much indistinguishable from normal TLS traffic.
Some VPNs go through extraordinary length for VPN over HTTP(S). It is not so trivial. Assuming that Uganda is likely buying blocking equipment from China.
Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
11–20 of 172 posts
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#12Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#13I'm not sure why this tax should be labelled as absurd. Lots of countries tax TV, phone already. Taxing social media sounds weird only because no one else has done it yet.
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#14Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#15Someone needs to make a small sketch of the Uganda government with 7 year olds making up the laws. Child 1 - "Let's tax people for being on social media to stop them from saying bad things about us" Child 2 - "Yeah that's a great idea. Plus we'll have more money for candy." Govenments notice - "Social media is hereby taxed. Your local ISP will be collecting the tax automatically." People - "Whatever, we'll just use V…
In sum, Tor is not trivially or resoundingly winning the censorship arms race, even though it has some good work on censorship circumvention that's often effective in particular countries.
Some good background on this is in
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#16I'm interested to see how they go about filtering VPN traffic. AFAIK, running openvpn over port 443 is pretty much indistinguishable from normal TLS traffic.
China's gotten pretty good at it. OpenVPN running over port 443 is generally going to be using a CA that is not a public CA, and issues certificates directly rather than through an intermediate. Even if you tunnel something over normal TLS, the type of traffic can potentially be determined by analyzing how much data flows in which direction and when. If circumvention is seen as too widely spread, Uganda may simply de…
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#17I'm not sure why this tax should be labelled as absurd. Lots of countries tax TV, phone already. Taxing social media sounds weird only because no one else has done it yet.
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some VPNs go through extraordinary length for VPN over HTTP(S). It is not so trivial. Assuming that Uganda is likely buying blocking equipment from China.
Probably more like silicon valley. Bluecoat vars have been known to sell equipment to sanctioned countries and those that violate human rights.
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#19I'm interested to see how they go about filtering VPN traffic. AFAIK, running openvpn over port 443 is pretty much indistinguishable from normal TLS traffic.
Some VPNs go through extraordinary length for VPN over HTTP(S). It is not so trivial. Assuming that Uganda is likely buying blocking equipment from China.
If you want to build your own, use at least VPN that was developed in Japan. (Google)
Re: Uganda Bans VPNs to Prevent Users from Dodging Its New Social Media Tax
#20Someone needs to make a small sketch of the Uganda government with 7 year olds making up the laws. Child 1 - "Let's tax people for being on social media to stop them from saying bad things about us" Child 2 - "Yeah that's a great idea. Plus we'll have more money for candy." Govenments notice - "Social media is hereby taxed. Your local ISP will be collecting the tax automatically." People - "Whatever, we'll just use V…
The vast majority of the population, and I'd bet it's even higher in Uganda does not even know what Tor is, yet alone how to use it.
My mom just figured out how to send photos via text message for heaven's sake.