Live data from Hacker News

The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

wired.com

11–20 of 66 posts

Re: The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

#11

Never understood the underpaying of highly qualified people in the govt. Making a sacrifice for your country in a high powered / representative position is one thing, but the rank and file? Billions are spent on defense contracts and old software, but when bringing on teams of people to revamp the system, they want these people to take more than a 50% pay cut. D.C. is an expensive place to live as well. If you think…

[deleted]

Re: The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

#12

I really enjoyed this article. The DDS is literally doing the same kind of things that the USDS is doing, but for military applications. Given the fact that the largest portion of our taxes goes towards defense spending, initiatives like create opportunities to allocate resources more efficiently, iterate with agility, and save a ton of money. When you look at DoD contractors, there is obviously a motivation on their…

Going out on a limb here to bet that whatever website they did develop doesn't fare well on accessibility standards...

Re: The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

#13
post #9

I really enjoyed this article. The DDS is literally doing the same kind of things that the USDS is doing, but for military applications. Given the fact that the largest portion of our taxes goes towards defense spending, initiatives like create opportunities to allocate resources more efficiently, iterate with agility, and save a ton of money. When you look at DoD contractors, there is obviously a motivation on their…

The largest portion of our taxes does not go to defense spending. It goes to entitlements.

Absolutely. 62% of the budget goes to social security, Medicare, and Medicaid. The rest is discretionary spending and a bit more than half of that goes to “defense”.

Source: https://www.thebalance.com/u-s-federal-budget-breakdown-3305...

Re: The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

#14
As someone who works for the Defense Department I found this article totally unsurprising. This sort of story is common. The question people should be asking is why does it take a 3-star general's blessing in order to get a team functioning computers that are usable for something besides Email and Microsoft Office.

Another major obstacle that isn't touched on in this article is buying things. Typical timeline for purchasing anything through the normal mechanisms is minimum 4 months and 6-9 months isn't uncommon many years. Doesn't really matter how much it costs. So any group that wants to get things done on a reasonable timeline ends up putting a substantial portion of their budget on a contract who's sole purpose is to be a purchasing vehicle that circumvents the usual buying process.

Re: The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

#15

Never understood the underpaying of highly qualified people in the govt. Making a sacrifice for your country in a high powered / representative position is one thing, but the rank and file? Billions are spent on defense contracts and old software, but when bringing on teams of people to revamp the system, they want these people to take more than a 50% pay cut. D.C. is an expensive place to live as well. If you think…

Eh, look at it as a filter for true believers. Mercenaries are dangerous, because they have a price.

It could also create disgruntled employees. Finding people feeling underpaid and undervalued must be prime candidates for foreign agents. While definity not an expert in this, every time I've read about traitors it seems money, sex or ideology drive the betrayal. And the first seems the most common in modern times.

Re: The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

#16

Never understood the underpaying of highly qualified people in the govt. Making a sacrifice for your country in a high powered / representative position is one thing, but the rank and file? Billions are spent on defense contracts and old software, but when bringing on teams of people to revamp the system, they want these people to take more than a 50% pay cut. D.C. is an expensive place to live as well. If you think…

Eh, look at it as a filter for true believers. Mercenaries are dangerous, because they have a price.

I definitely wouldn't characterize the average government employee as a "true believer" at all. Given the pension-salary ratio, they are mostly selected for being risk adverse and unambitious.

Re: The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

#17
post #3

> “The Army didn’t really know what to do with me,” he says. “So they sent me to Ranger School. I learned how to jump out of planes and carry rifles and stuff like that.” GROAN What branch did you go, fuckwit? That's what the Army wanted to do with you.

Please don't do this here.

Re: The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eh, look at it as a filter for true believers. Mercenaries are dangerous, because they have a price.

It could also create disgruntled employees. Finding people feeling underpaid and undervalued must be prime candidates for foreign agents. While definity not an expert in this, every time I've read about traitors it seems money, sex or ideology drive the betrayal. And the first seems the most common in modern times.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldrich_Ames

> Ames later said that this financial pressure was what had first led him to consider spying for the Soviet Union

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Hanssen

> He never indicated any political or ideological motive for his actions, telling the FBI after he was caught that his only motivation was profit

> The FBI paid $7 million to a KGB agent to obtain a file on an anonymous mole, who the FBI later identified as Hanssen through fingerprint and voice analysis.

Re: The Pentagon Is Building a Team of Tech-Savvy Soldiers

#20

Never understood the underpaying of highly qualified people in the govt. Making a sacrifice for your country in a high powered / representative position is one thing, but the rank and file? Billions are spent on defense contracts and old software, but when bringing on teams of people to revamp the system, they want these people to take more than a 50% pay cut. D.C. is an expensive place to live as well. If you think…

I work for federal government. And the government subsidies my pay @ $4500 to live in DC. I’m humbled by my opportunity to be in the public service. I’ve turned down valley jobs. US gov is filled with highly qualified people. You just don’t know their twitter.
Post reply on HN