As an outsider to Silicon Valley, it really seems like it's full of drama and ego wars. Seeing grown men and women argue like children really makes me happy I resisted the urge to move out there.
Ron Conway Drops A Nuclear Bomb On The Super Angels
11–20 of 218 posts
Re: Ron Conway Drops A Nuclear Bomb On The Super Angels
#12Dropping a "nuclear bomb" would be something like, "I have a recording from the Bin 38 meeting that proves you were colluding. The FTC will start examining it at 9am sharp tomorrow morning."
Sure, it's unusual for someone to so strongly come out and call people out, especially people that he may want to invest alongside someday, but "nuclear bomb" is a serious stretch.
Re: Ron Conway Drops A Nuclear Bomb On The Super Angels
#13As an outsider to Silicon Valley, it really seems like it's full of drama and ego wars. Seeing grown men and women argue like children really makes me happy I resisted the urge to move out there.
Re: Ron Conway Drops A Nuclear Bomb On The Super Angels
#14My paraphrased short version: Ron Conway to the super-angels: I'm in this game because I love seeing entrepreneurs build cool stuff. You guys aren't. Stop worrying about term sheets and valuations and worry about adding value beyond cash. I've wanted to say this for a long time, but have bit my lip in your presence. I no longer want to be involved with any of you. And Dave McClure, quit being a classless embarrassmen…
Re: Ron Conway Drops A Nuclear Bomb On The Super Angels
#15"Dave McCLure…pls try not to blog about this and cause silicon valley more embarrassment with your unprofessional classless writings" OUCH
I seriously don't understand how people were defending his writing style. Anyone over ninteen would realize the use of multi-colored text, "drop a cap in yo ass" lines, and lack of capitalization looks like you're lazy and incompetent. I realize he's done fairly well in his investments, but does he not have an extra 2-3 minutes to capitalize and think out more coherent analogies?
Re: Ron Conway Drops A Nuclear Bomb On The Super Angels
#16For example, some of the panel at Disrupt were being rude (talking amongst themselves during a startup presentation), and he stopped everything and called them out on it. These weren't just random judges- they were some of Silicon Valley's most influential people. He never once took a shot at any of the startups presenting. He may have given people like Carol Bartz a hard time, but they can take it.
I may not necessarily want him as a friend, but I really respect Arrington. This email from Conway basically proves "yet again, Arrington knew what he was doing."
============================
Edits about the people posting below me:
- Leo Laporte: a) Leo Laporte can take it, and b) Arrington was merely asking for a disclosure. I don't think that proves me wrong.
- Last.fm: Linking to the official blog of a company being accused isn't proof. There's much more to the story that came after that (ie http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/22/deny-this-lastfm/; not to say linking to TC is any better)
- I'm sure Arrington has been wrong at some point.. I just said I couldn't think of anything.
Re: Ron Conway Drops A Nuclear Bomb On The Super Angels
#17Edited for clarity.
Re: Ron Conway Drops A Nuclear Bomb On The Super Angels
#18I can predict two things;
1) The younger angels react and further split themselves from the Ron way of doing business. or
2) You will hear no more about this public debacle. It's clearly bad for business and any smart investor will shut up now.
Re: Ron Conway Drops A Nuclear Bomb On The Super Angels
#19That's pretty linkbaity. Dropping a "nuclear bomb" would be something like, "I have a recording from the Bin 38 meeting that proves you were colluding. The FTC will start examining it at 9am sharp tomorrow morning." Sure, it's unusual for someone to so strongly come out and call people out, especially people that he may want to invest alongside someday, but "nuclear bomb" is a serious stretch.