11–14 of 14 posts
a better approach would be implementing a zero-knowledge storage infrastructure, like tarsnap.
I'm sure Dropbox takes security seriously and works hard at it but this piece doesn't tell me a lot more than that except in much longer form. You can find/replace 'trust' (and 'security') with 'truck' and come away as informed and potentially slightly more amused.
Some informative parts that keep their meaning under s/trust/truck/g include: "... daylong social engineering workshop designed and led by internal experts that immersed them in a hypothetical scenario involving a malicious insider." "... a hands-on workshop where Dropbox employees researched, crafted, and presented their own phishing schemes." "... our annual Capture the Flag" It's interesting the emphasis on social…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
These sorts of hills grow to mountains with the bones of hopeful pedants who die on them. But I think there's still a chance to hold this one. That's not what 'zero knowledge' means, it's a technical term for a different thing.
you are technically correct (the best kind of correct). but it's a commonly understood concept: https://www.google.com/search?q=zero+knowledge+storage
https://spideroak.com/articles/why-we-will-no-longer-use-the...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
you are technically correct (the best kind of correct). but it's a commonly understood concept: https://www.google.com/search?q=zero+knowledge+storage
Hold the line. This one we can still win. Hold the line. https://spideroak.com/articles/why-we-will-no-longer-use-the...