Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
11–20 of 55 posts
Re: Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
#12The brain definitely has an edge on compute power. The computer has an edge on storage power. I would bet the brain doesn’t store more than a Terabyte of information. We just need more cores without spiking energy usage.
Being electrochemical, the brain is “slow” compared to a computer (around 10hz). But it’s massively parallel and an interesting combination of digital and analogue.
Re: Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
#13The brain definitely has an edge on compute power. The computer has an edge on storage power. I would bet the brain doesn’t store more than a Terabyte of information. We just need more cores without spiking energy usage.
Re: Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
#14Like a quantum computer, computing thousand calculations at once and the true answer is what remains? I guess there's a ... parallel there. And I know some people don't like this diductic reduction, analogy, metaphor, callitwhatyouwant. I'd welcome corrections.
Are you trying to say that brains are quantum computing devices? Maybe, but we don't have any particular evidence for that, so it's on a par with saying "The Flying Spaghetti Monster has a tiny noodly appendage that reaches through hyperspace into each neuron, and that's how we think."
We can observe brains in a lot of different ways - active electromagnetics, chemical sampling, microscopy, MRI... and we can say that injuring certain areas of the brain will impede certain functions. We know that excesses or droughts of some chemicals are associated with emotions, depression, and some diseases.
But we don't have a good model for how brains think, and among the good models we don't have, quantum computing is one of them.
Re: Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
#15"a professional tennis player can follow the trajectory of a tennis ball after it is served at a speed as high as 160 miles per hour" This is false or at least highly misleading. A reader might imagine that the player's eyes track the ball in flight. This is not what happens. A pro player reads the position of the serve and begins moving before the ball is hit. The predictive power of the brain is much more important…
Re: Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
#16"a professional tennis player can follow the trajectory of a tennis ball after it is served at a speed as high as 160 miles per hour" This is false or at least highly misleading. A reader might imagine that the player's eyes track the ball in flight. This is not what happens. A pro player reads the position of the serve and begins moving before the ball is hit. The predictive power of the brain is much more important…
Re: Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
#17I guess sleep is the closest thing we have but to me that's like saying drink water to fix tooth decay.
Re: Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
#18Re: Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
#19The brain definitely has an edge on compute power. The computer has an edge on storage power. I would bet the brain doesn’t store more than a Terabyte of information. We just need more cores without spiking energy usage.
Re: Why Is the Human Brain So Efficient? Massive Parallelism
#20How many milliseconds does it take for one layer of neurons to adjust its output? Let's call this number X. Can we conclude that if a task takes a human Y milliseconds, then a neural network with Y/X layers is sufficient for that task?