Live data from Hacker News

Flow chart of cognitive biases

breakdown-notes.com

11–20 of 30 posts

Re: Flow chart of cognitive biases

#11
post #5

Is there a way to print this out?

By using the export menu you should be able to print it to pdf, though that is not the easiest. To help out: you can also download it as pdf via google drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1dK-B5VIY9vmypB_eZsHB2Kso1zp...

It is a pdf, since it is rather big chart and as off yet I failed to make a readable image from it.

Re: Flow chart of cognitive biases

#13
post #7

The decision points have bad names. How can "When it was exaclty?" or "how satisfying it was ?" have a "yes" "no" answer?

I thought it was asking "are you trying to determine 'When it was exactly?' and 'Are you trying to remember how satisfying it was?'" which made sense.

That's not it. It's just garbled. "availability heuristic" means that recent or related-to-current-situation events are easier to remember than other, so they bias your mental estimate of "average" or "sum".

Re: Flow chart of cognitive biases

#16
post #15

For those interested, I built small project https://dailycognitivebias.com which basically send you every day a random cognitive bias to your inbox.

That's creepy good. It somehow usually sends me biases that have affected me that same day.

Frequency Illusion:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases#Frequ...

Re: Flow chart of cognitive biases

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I thought it was asking "are you trying to determine 'When it was exactly?' and 'Are you trying to remember how satisfying it was?'" which made sense.

That's not it. It's just garbled. "availability heuristic" means that recent or related-to-current-situation events are easier to remember than other, so they bias your mental estimate of "average" or "sum".

No, the GP has the right idea. The availability heuristic also causes emotionally-potent events to seem more recent than they were, because they're "available." Because recent events are easier to remember, our brains assume incorrectly that easier-to-remember events must be more recent. When, really, there are other reasons an event can be easier to remember.

This is the logic behind the "climate of fear" the media creates—every time a tragedy is made into a huge news story, it becomes semi-permanently available as an exemplar to your brain of that kind of thing happening; and then, when you try to figure out when the last time that kind of thing happened was (which is, in turn, a heuristic people tend to use for how often something happens) the highly-available exemplar in your mind makes you still feel like it "just happened" even if it was years ago.

(Or, to put that another way: everyone in America who was alive when 9/11 happened, still thinks of terrorist attacks against the US as happening far more often than they do; everyone in America who was born after 9/11 has a better-calibrated estimate. The scope of the tragedy—and especially of the reporting of the tragedy—caused it to be "too available" to people, permanently biasing their time-scale and frequency estimates.)

Post reply on HN