I'd love to hear from someone who has implemented this in production. Seems like really cool tech, but haven't had a chance to use it on a project yet.
Using it in production currently with dual-write and dual-read to compare perf. I'll do a write-up showing how Cockroach performs to Citus and Cassandra for my use case.
CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
11–20 of 187 posts
Re: CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
#12What drug was the person who drew that graphic on?
Re: CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Using it in production currently with dual-write and dual-read to compare perf. I'll do a write-up showing how Cockroach performs to Citus and Cassandra for my use case.
We use Citus and Memsql (big data analytics use cases). How does Cockroach handle joins and other OLAP style queries?
Re: CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
#14Re: CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Using it in production currently with dual-write and dual-read to compare perf. I'll do a write-up showing how Cockroach performs to Citus and Cassandra for my use case.
We use Citus and Memsql (big data analytics use cases). How does Cockroach handle joins and other OLAP style queries?
Citus is great if you want the Postgres interface but is still using standard rowstore tables. CockroachDB is similar with rowstore performance but with added distributed consensus overhead. They are both much better for OLTP and sharding. CockroachDB also provides easy high-availability and replication.
Re: CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
#16(PS: As expected ppl will downvote this, but just trying to give a very valuable feedback to ppl who don’t understand cockroach phobia.)
Re: CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
#17Re: CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Using it in production currently with dual-write and dual-read to compare perf. I'll do a write-up showing how Cockroach performs to Citus and Cassandra for my use case.
We use Citus and Memsql (big data analytics use cases). How does Cockroach handle joins and other OLAP style queries?
Re: CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
We use Citus and Memsql (big data analytics use cases). How does Cockroach handle joins and other OLAP style queries?
You're not going to get better performance for OLAP than MemSQL's columnstore and in-memory rowstore for reference tables to join. Citus is great if you want the Postgres interface but is still using standard rowstore tables. CockroachDB is similar with rowstore performance but with added distributed consensus overhead. They are both much better for OLTP and sharding. CockroachDB also provides easy high-availability…
Re: CockroachDB 2.0 Performance Makes Significant Strides
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
We use Citus and Memsql (big data analytics use cases). How does Cockroach handle joins and other OLAP style queries?
We use clickhouse cluster with 1000 nodes and 50000 GB clickstream data.