Live data from Hacker News

How Shyp Sunk: The Rise and Fall of an On-Demand Startup

fastcompany.com

11–20 of 26 posts

Re: How Shyp Sunk: The Rise and Fall of an On-Demand Startup

#14
CEO Gibbon talk sums it up. - prematurely scaled, charging deep discount price of $5 with the help of $65 Million VC money.

Looking back, Gibbon says that “the investment we took, everything we got, wasn’t warranted for where the business was at. And I think that really hurt us. The expectations were way too high. We had a lot of capital. We had to deploy it. And I don’t think we were ready to do that. We prematurely scaled.”

Re: How Shyp Sunk: The Rise and Fall of an On-Demand Startup

#17

CEO Gibbon talk sums it up. - prematurely scaled, charging deep discount price of $5 with the help of $65 Million VC money. Looking back, Gibbon says that “the investment we took, everything we got, wasn’t warranted for where the business was at. And I think that really hurt us. The expectations were way too high. We had a lot of capital. We had to deploy it. And I don’t think we were ready to do that. We prematurely…

"charging deep discount price of $5 with the help of $65 Million VC money"

Your comment reminds me of the pizza company in the most recent episode of Silicon Valley.

Re: How Shyp Sunk: The Rise and Fall of an On-Demand Startup

#18

CEO Gibbon talk sums it up. - prematurely scaled, charging deep discount price of $5 with the help of $65 Million VC money. Looking back, Gibbon says that “the investment we took, everything we got, wasn’t warranted for where the business was at. And I think that really hurt us. The expectations were way too high. We had a lot of capital. We had to deploy it. And I don’t think we were ready to do that. We prematurely…

"charging deep discount price of $5 with the help of $65 Million VC money" Your comment reminds me of the pizza company in the most recent episode of Silicon Valley.

It's not any different from Uber, as well

Re: How Shyp Sunk: The Rise and Fall of an On-Demand Startup

#19

CEO Gibbon talk sums it up. - prematurely scaled, charging deep discount price of $5 with the help of $65 Million VC money. Looking back, Gibbon says that “the investment we took, everything we got, wasn’t warranted for where the business was at. And I think that really hurt us. The expectations were way too high. We had a lot of capital. We had to deploy it. And I don’t think we were ready to do that. We prematurely…

"charging deep discount price of $5 with the help of $65 Million VC money" Your comment reminds me of the pizza company in the most recent episode of Silicon Valley.

Except Sliceline, in the HBO show, was inspired by real-life Slice, which makes a shocking amount of money.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.slicelife....

Slice is here in New York and I've been to their office and I know many of the programmers who work there, so I know they are surprisingly successful.

Re: How Shyp Sunk: The Rise and Fall of an On-Demand Startup

#20
post #12

If there's no demand at a true-cost price point, it means there's no demand. You can artificially inflate market interest by selling $20s for $10, but don't take that to mean you can later increase price to $30 and reach profitability.

Your second sentence is the clearest way I've seen unit economics viability summed up, nice.
Post reply on HN