I couldn't figure out why they couldn't marry. Choose not to, maybe, but "couldn't"?
From the article: > We would be married but for my condition, which has placed a question mark at the end of nearly everything. Will experimental treatments eventually fix me? Can I contribute to a family? Is it fair to ask that Dunia sustain a lifetime of my poor health?
She Was My World, but We Couldn’t Marry
11–18 of 18 posts
Re: She Was My World, but We Couldn’t Marry
#12I couldn't figure out why they couldn't marry. Choose not to, maybe, but "couldn't"?
Re: She Was My World, but We Couldn’t Marry
#13I couldn't figure out why they couldn't marry. Choose not to, maybe, but "couldn't"?
I know a distant relative in the Midwest who's wife had a stroke. After about a year they made the difficult decision to get divorced because the aftercare was ruining them financially (she couldn't live at home). By divorcing, she became eligible for federal assistance, allowing her husband to keep a house over their children's heads.
This is the reality of healthcare in the US.
Re: She Was My World, but We Couldn’t Marry
#14Interesting to compare/contrast this story with Richard Feynman's first marriage. Here author Ari Diaconis chooses NOT to marry Dunia Rkein due to his illness, uncertain survival prospect, and not wanting to burden her with his long-term care (if he survived) Compare to Feynman, who married Arline Greenbaum despite the fact that she had severe tuberculosis and only a slim chance to survive. Similar, but different. (O…
Depends if you’d give them your inheritance.
If you love someone and they're dying, being married to them especially in the 40s makes things a lot easier for handling their affairs both before and after they die.
There's so many laws even now that aren't fixed to handle when people aren't married.
Re: She Was My World, but We Couldn’t Marry
#15Re: She Was My World, but We Couldn’t Marry
#16I couldn't figure out why they couldn't marry. Choose not to, maybe, but "couldn't"?
In the US, medical issues can bankrupt people, even if they have insurance. If the couple married, his wife's income would be fair game to the hospitals and insurance companies. I know a distant relative in the Midwest who's wife had a stroke. After about a year they made the difficult decision to get divorced because the aftercare was ruining them financially (she couldn't live at home). By divorcing, she became eli…
Re: She Was My World, but We Couldn’t Marry
#17I couldn't figure out why they couldn't marry. Choose not to, maybe, but "couldn't"?
Also to keep in mind is that she'd be on the hook for his medical bills if they wed.
Re: She Was My World, but We Couldn’t Marry
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
From the article: > We would be married but for my condition, which has placed a question mark at the end of nearly everything. Will experimental treatments eventually fix me? Can I contribute to a family? Is it fair to ask that Dunia sustain a lifetime of my poor health?
I should have clarified. I read the article, including that quote. That sounds like a choice to me. Other people, such as Arline Greenbaum, in similar circumstances make different choices. Two gay men Saudi Arabian men "can't" marry.
I don't know Ari's situation, but I can guess because I'm living through something similar. When he states that "we can't marry", I'm guessing he came to that conclusion after looking at the full bill.
When you go from being a person's partner to being a dependent, when you lose all sources of income (don't count on that social safety net), when you can do few to no fun things together anymore, it doesn't feel like much of a choice anymore.
It takes a special type of person to marry into that. And if you do marry, you need to live with the guilt of imprisoning them forever too. This kind of thing is not a spectator sport. Everyone participates, and suffers. That's "choice".