How much bounty would Apple pay, say if somebody steals one and sends it to them? Is it illegal to them to make such an offer?
GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
11–20 of 97 posts
Re: GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
#12I hate this stuff. I want to secure my device and not have the govt or companies steal it, I want to control my device. Still, it's fascinating to learn about. Did no one think, when they take someone's phone for 5 minutes at the border, they could be doing this to your phone.
Re: GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
#13This seems at odds with Apple’s claims about holding the device encryption keys in a secure coprocessor that only releases them in response to a valid passcode, and self-destructs the keys if too many passcodes are tried.
Re: GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
#14This seems at odds with Apple’s claims about holding the device encryption keys in a secure coprocessor that only releases them in response to a valid passcode, and self-destructs the keys if too many passcodes are tried.
It’s not at odds with it - it’s pretty obviously using a vulnerability to run a crack against the passcode. Once the passcode is found, that is used to unlock the phone and this the Secure Enclave.
This looks like a software flaw, not a hardware attack. It will be interesting to know how Apple screwed this up.
Re: GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
#15That was and will always continue to be true. Even secure cryptoprocessors of the type used in smartcards and HSMs can be cracked with enough determination and time. There are companies in China who will read and clone them for surprisingly little money.
It has always amused me somewhat how scared (or the impression that articles like this give) some people are of governments, while at the same time completely accepting and trusting to being herded and controlled by the companies they purchase these locked-down computers from. Anything you truly want to keep secret should be encrypted by systems you have knowledge of, with a key that only you know, or even better --- not leaving your brain at all.
Unfortunately, the IP-Box 2 became widely available and was almost exclusively used illegitimately, rather than in law enforcement
If by "illegitimately" you mean third-party repair shops... I know Apple doesn't like that, but the whole *-box series are aimed at the mobile repair industry (a huge business in China), not law enforcement.
Re: GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
#16How much bounty would Apple pay, say if somebody steals one and sends it to them? Is it illegal to them to make such an offer?
The ‘offer’ isn’t illegal - going through with it would be though, for both sides. Grand theft and receiving stolen goods. Both not great, plus you’d be actively acting against the law enforcement system which would ensure a zealous prosecution.
Re: GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
#17Is it just me or does the price point seem extremely low? They have a device that should be in high demand globally, and maybe one competitor. And they are charging 15-30k, for basically unlimited usage?? You can't tell me federal law enforcement wouldn't pay at minimum ten times that amount for metered usage...
Re: GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
#18I hate this stuff. I want to secure my device and not have the govt or companies steal it, I want to control my device. Still, it's fascinating to learn about. Did no one think, when they take someone's phone for 5 minutes at the border, they could be doing this to your phone.
Well, as the article makes it clear it takes from hours to days to crack, no - they’re not doing this in 5 minutes at the border.
Re: GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
#19How much bounty would Apple pay, say if somebody steals one and sends it to them? Is it illegal to them to make such an offer?
Re: GrayKey iPhone unlocker poses serious security concerns
#20Is it just me or does the price point seem extremely low? They have a device that should be in high demand globally, and maybe one competitor. And they are charging 15-30k, for basically unlimited usage?? You can't tell me federal law enforcement wouldn't pay at minimum ten times that amount for metered usage...
The photo stagings remind me of ones I’d use on a pre-release marketing site for a vapor-ware product to test demand and a price point.