Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
11–20 of 37 posts
Re: Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
#12Re: Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
#13Re: Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
#14Re: Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
#15Re: Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
#16Looks neat! My one critique is the Contact Us link. I find unexpected mailto: links annoying because they cause my desktop mail client (which I don't use) to open unexpectedly when I'm expecting to be taken to a page, in this case a Contact Us page.
Re: Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
#17Looks neat! My one critique is the Contact Us link. I find unexpected mailto: links annoying because they cause my desktop mail client (which I don't use) to open unexpectedly when I'm expecting to be taken to a page, in this case a Contact Us page.
Thanks for the feedback. At initial step, I don't focus much on this thing. I will provide a nice contact page in future.
Re: Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
#18add a json validator!
Check out https://jsonchecker.com/
It validates and formats JSON.
Let me know if you have any feedback!
Re: Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
#19I'm curious, who here has a development workflow such that compressing/minifying code via an ad-hoc web tool makes sense? I've always just included it as part of a build process, or at the very least would pipe it into uglifyjs command line. I'm sure everyone's got their own needs but I just don't understand how that would be useful.
Re: Show HN: Online web tools to get your work done faster
#20Take this input HTML:
This is a title
Well.
I wonder…
It produces this output: This is a titleWell.I wonder…
It converted “doctype” to uppercase (equivalent, but bad for compression). It didn’t strip and as superfluous. It didn’t remove unnecessary quotes around attribute values. It didn’t remove the unnecessary closing tags.Here’s what I say it should have emitted:
This is a titleWell.I wonder…
30 characters shorter, and structurally equivalent.