Earlier quoted context omitted.
This point was raised when Gmail originally launched the feature. The problem is that it would essentially act as a read receipt, which is a privacy concern.
It would have to be based on any interaction the receiver has with the email, including viewing the inbox. However, if we're already worried about that level of privacy, even that change would do no good since it would mean the sender would know when the receiver checked their inbox.
Gmail Improves "Undo Send"
11–19 of 19 posts
Re: Gmail Improves "Undo Send"
#12Revolutionary. An outbox would be pretty nice.
What's wrong with the already existing Drafts feature?
Re: Gmail Improves "Undo Send"
#13Revolutionary. An outbox would be pretty nice.
I still fall on the "don't send it unless you mean to send it" side, however. My outbox is only used when I don't have internet access.
Re: Gmail Improves "Undo Send"
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
This point was raised when Gmail originally launched the feature. The problem is that it would essentially act as a read receipt, which is a privacy concern.
Plus it would add to confusion - you see it in your inbox (unread) and then you don't and wonder what happened. With Exchange you can do this and it usually just gets ugly in practice.
Re: Gmail Improves "Undo Send"
#15Revolutionary. An outbox would be pretty nice.
An interesting idea for a web-based email site. I don't think I've seen one (not that it really makes any sense, but I can see how some people would like it). Closest you have are drafts, which are pretty darned close, but it's not quite the same, no. I still fall on the "don't send it unless you mean to send it" side, however. My outbox is only used when I don't have internet access.
Re: Gmail Improves "Undo Send"
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
What's wrong with the already existing Drafts feature?
I tend to use Drafts more for emails that aren't actually completed, and an outbox for emails that are completed but with one last chance for me to look them over before they go out.
Re: Gmail Improves "Undo Send"
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
This point was raised when Gmail originally launched the feature. The problem is that it would essentially act as a read receipt, which is a privacy concern.
Plus it would add to confusion - you see it in your inbox (unread) and then you don't and wonder what happened. With Exchange you can do this and it usually just gets ugly in practice.
Re: Gmail Improves "Undo Send"
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would have to be based on any interaction the receiver has with the email, including viewing the inbox. However, if we're already worried about that level of privacy, even that change would do no good since it would mean the sender would know when the receiver checked their inbox.
In other words, the email may or may not exist until you observe it? Brilliant, they should market it as the first commercially viable quantum cloud.
Re: Gmail Improves "Undo Send"
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
This point was raised when Gmail originally launched the feature. The problem is that it would essentially act as a read receipt, which is a privacy concern.
It would have to be based on any interaction the receiver has with the email, including viewing the inbox. However, if we're already worried about that level of privacy, even that change would do no good since it would mean the sender would know when the receiver checked their inbox.