Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
11–20 of 129 posts
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
#12“We have received reports from a few customers of higher system reboots after applying firmware updates.” What does higher mean here?
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
#13Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
#14When Samsung phones were blowing up, I thought that was it, but somehow people kept preferring the phones.
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
#15“We have received reports from a few customers of higher system reboots after applying firmware updates.” What does higher mean here?
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
#16This is -- to say the least -- frustrating. First, the busted microcode is still available on the Intel Download Center[1], without any warning that they recommend that you not, in fact, install it. Second, the press release is still being evasive: they have not merely "received reports"; they in fact know that it's causing issues, and the press release is avoiding the much stronger language that Intel is giving priv…
Between Intel's numerous CPU bugs that they refused to refund customers for and ME, it's crystal clear what Intel thinks about their customers.
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
#17Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
#18Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
#19“We have received reports from a few customers of higher system reboots after applying firmware updates.” What does higher mean here?
Re: Intel Security Issue Update: Addressing Reboot Issues
#20This is -- to say the least -- frustrating. First, the busted microcode is still available on the Intel Download Center[1], without any warning that they recommend that you not, in fact, install it. Second, the press release is still being evasive: they have not merely "received reports"; they in fact know that it's causing issues, and the press release is avoiding the much stronger language that Intel is giving priv…
if you're going to make the accusation that they're lying, at least provide a source - near as I can tell they are being as transparent as is reasonable.
If he is saying that Intel is giving other advice privately then you are welcome not to believe him (and note that it is you who is using the much stronger term "lying" here).
Personally I think un-sourced statements from him are worth listening to.