Has YC had successful Biology startups with real exits? Just curious I couldn't find any.
https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/14/gingko-bioworks-secures-27...
11–20 of 155 posts
Has YC had successful Biology startups with real exits? Just curious I couldn't find any.
https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/14/gingko-bioworks-secures-27...
Do you have to move to the Bay Area? I'm a professor at WashU and am interested, but I live in St. Louis.
Biology and AI could possibly be the next coal face
Do you have to move to the Bay Area? I'm a professor at WashU and am interested, but I live in St. Louis.
Just move! It’s great here!
YC's "move to the bay area" requirement makes sense for software startups, but less so for bio (at least for most of the good ideas).
Why focus on age-related disease when massive racial and economic disparities still prevent a large proportion of the population from even reaching an advanced age?
a) There's no obligation to work on earthquake-ridden cities over any other issue.
b) Mythical Man Month problem; firefighters might be good at extinguishing flame but not repairing earthquake issues, and there's only so many civil engineers to go around.
c) Your comment is proof that no good deed goes unpunished.
Why focus on age-related disease when massive racial and economic disparities still prevent a large proportion of the population from even reaching an advanced age?
I wrote about the opportunity in bio earlier this week and run a program connecting top tier scientists with life sci VCs. If you are interested in bio and don't have a science background, this is the best time ever to get involved: http://newbio.tech/blog.html
The way I read it, they are saying "we know our resources are limited, and bio science is huge. And expensive. We don't presume to have all the answers. So we will focus on one small area at a time. First, we will achieve immortality. After all, all the breakthroughs in the next thousand years can't help your rotting bones. Barring violent accidemt (think nuclear explosion) there is no physical reason humans should have an end of life. Once we have achieved this, we will have a number of options about what to tackle next. We were frankly undecided between obesity and superintelligence. Solving one leaves you fit and attractive, after all, and AI will surpass human intelligence anyway. So why is our next bio focus after immortality on superintelligence, rather than obesity? Simple: having all the fitness answers in the world is no help if the subjects' dumb asses don't apply them. In fact, intelligence is more importance than fitness. If you're smart enough, you'll always apply the best techniques for fitness. On the other hand, if you're a dumbass, it doesn't matter how great the fitness solution is: you just won't apply it. So our focused, humble goals are, in order, immortality, superintelligence and making an adonis/aphrodite out of everyone." :D
Okay, now are you listening, founders? The above is actually not what I said it was about, but is actually what your game plan should be in the face of dumbass investors and a hostile world:
Step 1: become default-alive. Make your company immortal. Get a negative burn rate. Nobody can fail to roll sixes infinite times in a row. Even with loaded unfair dice. Become immortal. You are then guaranteed to win.
Step 2: become smarter. You will see your peers be dumbasses trying to focus on being attractive investment targets first. Ignore them. Investors aren't smart enough to invest in the most attractive business plans on the planet. So don't try to make an attractive business plan, instead, focus on a smarter product.
Step 3: when you have the smartest product and team in your industry, only then focus on being fit amd an attractive investment target.
Now you have all the tools you need to succeed. Good luck :)
p.s. sorry about hiding this bitter pill in what seemed like simple satire. My comment is totally off-topic and has nothing to do with YC Bio ;) It's pure 100% allegory all the way.