A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
11–20 of 157 posts
Re: A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
#12It's open to the public‽ Seems like a bad idea to let a potential spy in there to set up a camera and de-randomize this source of random info. Also, the headline on HN declares it a fact that the lava lamps are assisting in the encryption, but the article is careful to say "maybe", "might", etc. This seems wildly insecure and much more likely to represent a weak link than to actually aid in randomness.
Re: A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
#13It's open to the public‽ Seems like a bad idea to let a potential spy in there to set up a camera and de-randomize this source of random info. Also, the headline on HN declares it a fact that the lava lamps are assisting in the encryption, but the article is careful to say "maybe", "might", etc. This seems wildly insecure and much more likely to represent a weak link than to actually aid in randomness.
Re: A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
#14Hack the Planet = Hack a Camera?
Re: A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
#15It's open to the public‽ Seems like a bad idea to let a potential spy in there to set up a camera and de-randomize this source of random info. Also, the headline on HN declares it a fact that the lava lamps are assisting in the encryption, but the article is careful to say "maybe", "might", etc. This seems wildly insecure and much more likely to represent a weak link than to actually aid in randomness.
The nice thing about randomness is that given a random blob, you can xor a non random blob & it's just as random. So this is one input of entropy amongst a cocktail of sources
Re: A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
#16It's open to the public‽ Seems like a bad idea to let a potential spy in there to set up a camera and de-randomize this source of random info. Also, the headline on HN declares it a fact that the lava lamps are assisting in the encryption, but the article is careful to say "maybe", "might", etc. This seems wildly insecure and much more likely to represent a weak link than to actually aid in randomness.
The effort involved in doing this would maybe be as taxing as brute-forcing the keys in the first place. It seems gimmicky but they're almost surely producing reliable random data that would be almost impossible to simulate otherwise.
Re: A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
#17Re: A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
#18I might be prejudiced, but this looks like a big PR stunt/done for the cool factor kind of thing. Aren't there simpler/saner alternatives for getting good randomness?
Re: A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
#19It's open to the public‽ Seems like a bad idea to let a potential spy in there to set up a camera and de-randomize this source of random info. Also, the headline on HN declares it a fact that the lava lamps are assisting in the encryption, but the article is careful to say "maybe", "might", etc. This seems wildly insecure and much more likely to represent a weak link than to actually aid in randomness.
The nice thing about randomness is that given a random blob, you can xor a non random blob & it's just as random. So this is one input of entropy amongst a cocktail of sources
Re: A wall of lava lamps helps encrypt the internet
#20It's open to the public‽ Seems like a bad idea to let a potential spy in there to set up a camera and de-randomize this source of random info. Also, the headline on HN declares it a fact that the lava lamps are assisting in the encryption, but the article is careful to say "maybe", "might", etc. This seems wildly insecure and much more likely to represent a weak link than to actually aid in randomness.
Even if the data is not random it doesn't weaken your kernel prng by writing non-random data to urandom. Don't overcomplicate your threat model with non-existent risks