Live data from Hacker News

The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program

nytimes.com

11–20 of 287 posts

Re: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program

#12
post #9
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How so?

I don't know, the clouds don't look real to me. I also wonder why resolution mist always be this low, my cell phone ($250) can shoot 4K and a plane that costs millions can't shoot video that is detailed enough to investigate the phenomenon.

Avionics are always way behind consumer electronics due to safety and reliability certification requirements, as well as tiny production volumes. How well would your cell phone hold up to thousands of hours of intense vibrations, freezing temperatures, hard shocks, and hydraulic fluid leaks?

Re: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program

#13
post #11
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is that thing?!

Looks like an insect stuck on the camera lens.

I wouldn't guess an insect, but it does seem to track too well to the heading change of the aircraft. There seems to be no independent movement other than an orientation change.

Is the pilot in the video talking to a wingman or his weapons officer? (I think F-18E's are single seaters, but F-18F has a backseat).

Re: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program

#14
post #11
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is that thing?!

Looks like an insect stuck on the camera lens.

There were multiple contacts and the F-18s had telemetry on the objects, it wasn't just an optical trick. Also how do two different jets see the same insect stuck on a lens?

Re: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program

#15
post #9
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How so?

I don't know, the clouds don't look real to me. I also wonder why resolution mist always be this low, my cell phone ($250) can shoot 4K and a plane that costs millions can't shoot video that is detailed enough to investigate the phenomenon.

I think that video is from 2004, or at least the article makes mention of that, although the caption doesn’t date it.

Re: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program

#16
post #13
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looks like an insect stuck on the camera lens.

I wouldn't guess an insect, but it does seem to track too well to the heading change of the aircraft. There seems to be no independent movement other than an orientation change. Is the pilot in the video talking to a wingman or his weapons officer? (I think F-18E's are single seaters, but F-18F has a backseat).

[deleted]

Re: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program

#17
The one guy featured in this article, Luis Elizondo, is apart of Tom Delonge's (guy from the rock band Blink 182) wacky new company To The Stars Academy https://tothestarsacademy.com.

So yeah, I'm not sure he can be taken very seriously. Just listen to Tom Delong on Joe Rogan's podcast and see how wacky this all is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5n_3mnJfHzY

Re: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program

#19
The most interesting part to me

>Under Mr. Bigelow’s direction, the company modified buildings in Las Vegas for the storage of metal alloys and other materials that Mr. Elizondo and program contractors said had been recovered from unidentified aerial phenomena. Researchers also studied people who said they had experienced physical effects from encounters with the objects and examined them for any physiological changes. In addition, researchers spoke to military service members who had reported sightings of strange aircraft.

>“We’re sort of in the position of what would happen if you gave Leonardo da Vinci a garage-door opener,” said Harold E. Puthoff, an engineer who has conducted research on extrasensory perception for the C.I.A. and later worked as a contractor for the program. “First of all, he’d try to figure out what is this plastic stuff. He wouldn’t know anything about the electromagnetic signals involved or its function.”

They claim to have physical evidence? Seems like a buried lede if even remotely true.

Re: The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program

#20
I looks like the plane is making a left turn, and yet the object is dead center in the screen with barely any shake. And it's definitely not stabilized, because all the lines on the display are still.

So maybe the pilot has some crazy ability to track a flying object perfectly while turning, but try doing it in any game and I think you will fail.

Post reply on HN