Live data from Hacker News

LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corporate welfare

boingboing.net

11–20 of 222 posts

Re: LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corporate welfare

#11
post #5

> Disney CEO Bob Iger is said to have ordered the retaliatory measure against the LA Times, and is also thought to be considering a 2020 presidential bid, which augurs poorly for his approach to the free press. Wow, I hadn't heard this was a possibility until now. I sure am looking forward to seeing which of the many {m/b}illionaires ends up winning the presidency in 2020! How about we just cut out the middlemen and…

Reminds me of the short lived reign of the emperor who purchased his title. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didius_Julianus

Re: LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corporate welfare

#12
So let's assume the people who run Anaheim are not idiots. My question would be did they run the cost analysis of these tax breaks for Disney versus the expected boon to the city from other incomes? If the income from externalities is greater than the actual income would have been from Disney, it seems like it would have been a decent decision. This is of course ignoring political principles of fair taxation.

Re: LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corporate welfare

#14
Curious how much headwind this will generate. Other critics and award groups already boycotting Disney screenings in solidarity:

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/journalists-boycott-di...

https://www.thewrap.com/critics-denounce-disney-blackout-la-...

Re: LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corporate welfare

#15
post #5

> Disney CEO Bob Iger is said to have ordered the retaliatory measure against the LA Times, and is also thought to be considering a 2020 presidential bid, which augurs poorly for his approach to the free press. Wow, I hadn't heard this was a possibility until now. I sure am looking forward to seeing which of the many {m/b}illionaires ends up winning the presidency in 2020! How about we just cut out the middlemen and…

>Most money offered gets to be president.

Didn't seem to work very well for Hillary... (I know this sounds like a cheap shot, but it completely breaks down your argument)

Re: LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corporate welfare

#17
If I were the LA Times, every Disney movie review would be replaced by text saying "Disney has blacklisted us from early screenings as a retaliation for an article we published on them. When our reviewer has a chance to attend a normal screening we will place the review here, until then, please enjoy this reprint of the original article".

Re: LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corporate welfare

#18
post #9
post #5

> Disney CEO Bob Iger is said to have ordered the retaliatory measure against the LA Times, and is also thought to be considering a 2020 presidential bid, which augurs poorly for his approach to the free press. Wow, I hadn't heard this was a possibility until now. I sure am looking forward to seeing which of the many {m/b}illionaires ends up winning the presidency in 2020! How about we just cut out the middlemen and…

Let's just start selling the role outright. It would be more efficient, most likely lead to the same result, and avoiding the grating, bullshit horserace coverage for a year would make everyone's live better.

This is a funny joke, but empirically not true as of this last election. Hillary massively out spent Trump.

Re: LA Times barred from Disney movies after report on corporate welfare

#20
Government should not be picking winners and losers. Giving tax breaks and subsidies to Disney so they can stay afloat is horrible. Hats off to the LA times for exposing this, the people are waking up and are tired of big government and corporate America robbing the poor and middle class blind.
Post reply on HN