I would try to make comparison with Google's CLD tomorrow
Bearing in mind that fastText supports many more languages than CLD.
depends on the mode, but I've compared with only ~60 languages
Fast and accurate language identification using fastText
11–13 of 13 posts
Re: Fast and accurate language identification using fastText
#12Why is it just 93% accurate on Wikipedia? Is it that hard to identify languages?
I suspect it's due to mixed-language content on Wikipedia. A lot of Wikipedia articles talk about foreign language art and culture, this is one of the largest (if not the largest) single categories of content on non-English Wikipedias.
Yes, it's not so good on the samples with several languages