Live data from Hacker News

The Complicated Backstory to a New Children’s Book by Mark Twain

newyorker.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: The Complicated Backstory to a New Children’s Book by Mark Twain

#11
post #10
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's the opposite of plagiarism? If there's isn't a term for it, maybe we should coin one just for this.

> What's the opposite of plagiarism? Original authorship? Or am I misunderstanding what you're getting at? (It wouldn't be the first time :)

I'm guessing they are asking about "attributing your words to others" rather than "claiming another's words as your own".

Re: The Complicated Backstory to a New Children’s Book by Mark Twain

#12
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What's the opposite of plagiarism? Original authorship? Or am I misunderstanding what you're getting at? (It wouldn't be the first time :)

I'm guessing they are asking about "attributing your words to others" rather than "claiming another's words as your own".

Ah. That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.

Edit to add: Forgery seems in the ballpark, but doesn't feel quite right.

Re: The Complicated Backstory to a New Children’s Book by Mark Twain

#13
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm guessing they are asking about "attributing your words to others" rather than "claiming another's words as your own".

Ah. That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification. Edit to add: Forgery seems in the ballpark, but doesn't feel quite right.

The clarification is correct, just for the record.

I agree that "forgery" doesn't quite seem right for this, although it's close. If they had claimed to have an original Twain work that was being published unedited, but was in fact a new creation, then it would fit, but they're not really hiding the fact that it's been altered.... "Appropriation" and "misrepresentation" both fit, but are overly general.

Post reply on HN