This is a bit off topic, but bear with me: so far, nearly every comment in this thread has contained some degree cynicism toward cryptocurrency-related funding. Why does HN have such a distaste for cryptocurrencies? Why can't we just have an intelligent conversation about this new technology? Why do we have all the negativity and downvotes for any remotely positive comments related to cryptocurrencies? This is super…
How positive are we meant to be about out right scams and Ponzi schemes?
The first ICO unicorns are here
11–20 of 60 posts
Re: The first ICO unicorns are here
#12This is a bit off topic, but bear with me: so far, nearly every comment in this thread has contained some degree cynicism toward cryptocurrency-related funding. Why does HN have such a distaste for cryptocurrencies? Why can't we just have an intelligent conversation about this new technology? Why do we have all the negativity and downvotes for any remotely positive comments related to cryptocurrencies? This is super…
Are blockchains cool? OH FUCK YES!
Is people raising a lot of cash from suckers in a bubble-y market that threatens to rebound on all of us cool? Some might opine that this is slightly less than maximally cool.
Re: The first ICO unicorns are here
#13Re: The first ICO unicorns are here
#14This is a bit off topic, but bear with me: so far, nearly every comment in this thread has contained some degree cynicism toward cryptocurrency-related funding. Why does HN have such a distaste for cryptocurrencies? Why can't we just have an intelligent conversation about this new technology? Why do we have all the negativity and downvotes for any remotely positive comments related to cryptocurrencies? This is super…
A lot of people find the technologies incredibly interesting and potentially extremely useful. Similarly, a lot of people find the uses to which those extremely interesting technologies are being put to be at best questionable and of marginal utility. Are blockchains cool? OH FUCK YES! Is people raising a lot of cash from suckers in a bubble-y market that threatens to rebound on all of us cool? Some might opine that…
The tech is cool, and the new funding model is also fascinating. Never before has it been possible for everyone to participate in the early funding of startups.
Sure, most will fail, but that's not different from the old model. The biggest difference is that it's not based on cronyism anymore.
Re: The first ICO unicorns are here
#15Re: The first ICO unicorns are here
#16This is a bit off topic, but bear with me: so far, nearly every comment in this thread has contained some degree cynicism toward cryptocurrency-related funding. Why does HN have such a distaste for cryptocurrencies? Why can't we just have an intelligent conversation about this new technology? Why do we have all the negativity and downvotes for any remotely positive comments related to cryptocurrencies? This is super…
Re: The first ICO unicorns are here
#17This is a bit off topic, but bear with me: so far, nearly every comment in this thread has contained some degree cynicism toward cryptocurrency-related funding. Why does HN have such a distaste for cryptocurrencies? Why can't we just have an intelligent conversation about this new technology? Why do we have all the negativity and downvotes for any remotely positive comments related to cryptocurrencies? This is super…
The Internet is a great technology but the dot com bubble still burst.
Does that mean we should shun and shame this new technology? Doing so would seem—to me at least—to be something that's really not in the spirit of HN.
Re: The first ICO unicorns are here
#18This is a bit off topic, but bear with me: so far, nearly every comment in this thread has contained some degree cynicism toward cryptocurrency-related funding. Why does HN have such a distaste for cryptocurrencies? Why can't we just have an intelligent conversation about this new technology? Why do we have all the negativity and downvotes for any remotely positive comments related to cryptocurrencies? This is super…
It's being exploited by capitalists who don't fully understand the tech or its implications but who see a way to make some quick cash.
Couple all of this with the fact that the market is becoming extremely saturated with various coins, and bad management / corruption leading to fracturing of the Bitcoin blockchain, and you may start to see a problem developing. Bitcoin needs public adoption in order to prevail. It needs cohesion. It is losing ground on both fronts every day.
It's becoming clear that Bitcoin itself will not survive if Bitcoin Core continues to mix up their priorities and support / engage in vitriolic public discourse with those who think differently. But cryptocurrency tech itself is such a powerful idea, it really has the chance to revolutionize how we think about and use money.
Yet that won't happen as long as the general public, whose support is needed, is distracted and scared away by all of the different coins on the market, the controversy around Core / SegWit, or even worse, they see it as something completely trivial and useless thanks to the myriad of pointless coins being passed around to idiots who want to get in on the tulip mania. [0]
It's hard not to notice the bubble if you're paying attention. My hope is just that, after the bubble pops, something is left. Something that can evolve into a dependable, ubiquitous, cohesive technology that improves ours lives in the ways we dream it can.
Re: The first ICO unicorns are here
#19This is a bit off topic, but bear with me: so far, nearly every comment in this thread has contained some degree cynicism toward cryptocurrency-related funding. Why does HN have such a distaste for cryptocurrencies? Why can't we just have an intelligent conversation about this new technology? Why do we have all the negativity and downvotes for any remotely positive comments related to cryptocurrencies? This is super…
ICO's offer people investment opportunities to people who for numerous reasons couldn't invest in anything before.
That's a wonderful thing with educated investors prepared for the risk, but what some of these companies are pulling is modern day snake oil.
I'm not just talking about shady types, plenty of respectable people acting poorly for quick money. YC is in on it too with filecoin, history will be the judge and I hope all involved are remembered.
Go read some of the ico forums, ask yourself whether these people are stealing from underage children. Please.
Re: The first ICO unicorns are here
#20This is a bit off topic, but bear with me: so far, nearly every comment in this thread has contained some degree cynicism toward cryptocurrency-related funding. Why does HN have such a distaste for cryptocurrencies? Why can't we just have an intelligent conversation about this new technology? Why do we have all the negativity and downvotes for any remotely positive comments related to cryptocurrencies? This is super…
This isn't directly about cryptocurrencies. I think it's more about, at least for me, the fact that a technology as promising, useful, and technically impressive as Bitcoin / the blockchain is being trivialized to such a high degree recently. It's being exploited by capitalists who don't fully understand the tech or its implications but who see a way to make some quick cash. Couple all of this with the fact that the…
It would be foolish, however, to assume that there won't be a handful of these startups that go on to actually change the world in a big way. Bitcoin, arguably, is already quite far along in that regard.