11–20 of 204 posts
Personal favorite snippet from the article: > With this pedigree, PullRequest has managed to draw interest from 450 teams. Though only a portion of these are actually using the service, PullRequest touts a $136 million annualized revenue run rate. From Crunchbase: founded May, 2017. As a disclaimer, I'm no accountant, but that just seems downright deliberately misleading. Their standard plan is $49/mo.
Personal favorite snippet from the article: > With this pedigree, PullRequest has managed to draw interest from 450 teams. Though only a portion of these are actually using the service, PullRequest touts a $136 million annualized revenue run rate. From Crunchbase: founded May, 2017. As a disclaimer, I'm no accountant, but that just seems downright deliberately misleading. Their standard plan is $49/mo.
Both Buxfer and Splitwise serve the exact same functions as Honeydue (splitting bills/expenses with room mates and/or partners), and both of them are free to use. Sadly, neither app has found a way to be all that profitable after all these years.
Maybe Honeydue will do something to solve the marketing problem that apparently both Buxfer and Splitwise have?
Personal favorite snippet from the article: > With this pedigree, PullRequest has managed to draw interest from 450 teams. Though only a portion of these are actually using the service, PullRequest touts a $136 million annualized revenue run rate. From Crunchbase: founded May, 2017. As a disclaimer, I'm no accountant, but that just seems downright deliberately misleading. Their standard plan is $49/mo.
Personal favorite snippet from the article: > With this pedigree, PullRequest has managed to draw interest from 450 teams. Though only a portion of these are actually using the service, PullRequest touts a $136 million annualized revenue run rate. From Crunchbase: founded May, 2017. As a disclaimer, I'm no accountant, but that just seems downright deliberately misleading. Their standard plan is $49/mo.
> * Billing is dependent on amount of meaningful change per month. $9 per user per month for static analysis.
I agree it still sounds far fetched that their at the $136 million ARR, but it's not infeasible they're somewhere near the the low-to-mid 8-figures, with their enterprise solutions as well.
If it was $9/user, for all those companies that figure would require the average team size to be 2,800 people. Which is extremely unlikely.
Personal favorite snippet from the article: > With this pedigree, PullRequest has managed to draw interest from 450 teams. Though only a portion of these are actually using the service, PullRequest touts a $136 million annualized revenue run rate. From Crunchbase: founded May, 2017. As a disclaimer, I'm no accountant, but that just seems downright deliberately misleading. Their standard plan is $49/mo.
Personal favorite snippet from the article: > With this pedigree, PullRequest has managed to draw interest from 450 teams. Though only a portion of these are actually using the service, PullRequest touts a $136 million annualized revenue run rate. From Crunchbase: founded May, 2017. As a disclaimer, I'm no accountant, but that just seems downright deliberately misleading. Their standard plan is $49/mo.
Personal favorite snippet from the article: > With this pedigree, PullRequest has managed to draw interest from 450 teams. Though only a portion of these are actually using the service, PullRequest touts a $136 million annualized revenue run rate. From Crunchbase: founded May, 2017. As a disclaimer, I'm no accountant, but that just seems downright deliberately misleading. Their standard plan is $49/mo.
Founder of PullRequest here: To be clear: $136,000, not $136mm. Typo on article.
Congrats on the revenue and best of luck growing the company.