Live data from Hacker News

Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network [pdf]

filecoin.io

11–20 of 170 posts

Re: Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network [pdf]

#11
This whitepaper is the first overview of updated Filecoin protocol. More details about specific components of Filecoin (like Proof-of-Replication, Proof-of-Spacetime) will be released in future in their own publications.

It is also accompanied by an announcement of the Filecoin Token Sale: https://protocol.ai/blog/ann-filecoin-token-sale-and-new-pap... which will begin on July 27th.

Re: Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network [pdf]

#15
post #2

Coming from academia, these sort of papers would not pass any sort of double-bind peer review process. Where's the actual science? Where are the experiments? It seems to be just a document describing the protocol of Filecoin, which is fine. The problem is that all these "whitepapers" coming from these cryptocurrency communities seem to be promoted as scientific papers, but in reality do not stand a chance in any scie…

I don't think this or any paper like it pretends to be academic or scientific.

don't call them papers

This is ridiculous and elitist. Papers outside of peer reviewed academia can and do exist. If anything, academics ought to qualify what they mean when they say "paper".

Re: Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network [pdf]

#16
post #2

Coming from academia, these sort of papers would not pass any sort of double-bind peer review process. Where's the actual science? Where are the experiments? It seems to be just a document describing the protocol of Filecoin, which is fine. The problem is that all these "whitepapers" coming from these cryptocurrency communities seem to be promoted as scientific papers, but in reality do not stand a chance in any scie…

> Coming from academia, these sort of papers would not pass any sort of double-bind peer review process. Where's the actual science? Where are the experiments?

Also coming from academia, I'm surprised with the amount of crap that makes it through "peer review". And there's nothing wrong with concept papers as long as they don't purport to be more than that. Lastly, I don't think the review stage is ever truly double-blind. In a niche field, you almost always have some idea of who the paper's authors are.

Re: Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network [pdf]

#17

I still go back to this paper for questions about decentralized storage: http://blog.dshr.org/2017/07/is-decentralized-storage-sustai...

Basically the same reason that bitcoin mining is becoming centralized by a small set of miners in China.

At least there is a benefit to being close to the requestor in terms of bandwidth/latency so as long as the network rewards that storage should be more decentralized than mining.

Re: Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network [pdf]

#18

storj.io

StorJ doesn't allow users to exchange coins for storage. Last I checked you had to buy storage from some kind of broker and conveniently, the only people running one were the StorJ devs themselves.

That level of centralization is unacceptable.

Re: Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network [pdf]

#19

I still go back to this paper for questions about decentralized storage: http://blog.dshr.org/2017/07/is-decentralized-storage-sustai...

pfraze wrote a nice response to that post the other day: https://medium.com/blue-link-labs/in-response-to-is-decentra...
Post reply on HN