Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Object Storage

digitalocean.com

11–20 of 43 posts

Re: Introducing Object Storage

#11
post #3

Slowly, very slowly, DO is creeping towards having enough features to peel users off of AWS and GCP. Block storage, load balancers, and now blob storage...if you don't need managed queues or databases, you can probably save some serious coin by running services on DO. S3 sets a high bar in terms of durability and availability, so it will be interesting to see how well DO can compete, and it will take a long time to g…

Good to know. Am in the throes of choosing between both for a simple project

Re: Introducing Object Storage

#12
post #3

Slowly, very slowly, DO is creeping towards having enough features to peel users off of AWS and GCP. Block storage, load balancers, and now blob storage...if you don't need managed queues or databases, you can probably save some serious coin by running services on DO. S3 sets a high bar in terms of durability and availability, so it will be interesting to see how well DO can compete, and it will take a long time to g…

I wouldn't be surprised to see DO either roll out DaaS next or partner with someone (Compose.io?) to do it. That's one of two things (the other being VPC, which I know they're working on per HN posts elsewhere) that make AWS/GCP tempting over DO for me.

That said, I kind of hope it's not Compose.io - they seem ridiculously overpriced for PostgreSQL compared to AWS's and GCP's offerings.

Re: Introducing Object Storage

#14
post #2

If there's anything I've learned about object storage over the last year, it is: don't use object storage unless you need it for a particularly narrow use case of silly data volumes or CDN storage for a massively distributed content network. Anything else, forget it. It rarely if ever works properly with standard Linux or Windows tools (s3), it has a rat's nest of arbitrary restrictions which require a language lawye…

> credential storage is a nightmare for distribution compared to rsync/ssh.

I don't understand this argument. Why is it harder to store credentials for S3 or GCS than it is to store credentials for rsync or ssh?

Re: Introducing Object Storage

#15

I wonder what technology they use under the hood. Ceph? GlusterFS? Custom software?

they chose to make their own stack afew years ago instead of going with the already available and business friendly openstack, going by the same reasoning and the long amount of time they took to reach here, it highly likely to be a custom thing.

Re: Introducing Object Storage

#16
post #8
post #5

There's pretty much zero information on that page, so why should I care?

We roll out a public beta test with existing customers to ensure performance and reliability before doing a GA release. This allows customers to use the new product and provide feedback as well as help us to ensure a great level of service when the product goes full GA. So it's really a way for customers to test out new products early, but the specific details are specifically light so that if there are any major cha…

I think it's a little weird to say "Introducing Object Storage" when you're not introducing anything at all. There's zero information about it!

Is it S3 compatible? Does it compete with S3? Does it supports static file hosting? How do permissions work?

I think it would make more sense to communicate that you're looking for beta testers for an object storage service.

Re: Introducing Object Storage

#18
Incase anyone missed the recent cloud firewall announcement https://blog.digitalocean.com/cloud-firewalls-secure-droplet...

This might be possible because of the advances in software defined networking. Cloud firewall removes the hassles of setting up complex iptables in the name of network security and frees those extra cpu cycles and memory utilization.

DigitalOcean is getting better at solving common VPS use cases. I like it :)

Re: Introducing Object Storage

#19
post #9
post #7

Anybody have or see pricing after early access period?

We aren't providing pricing information till full GA which is later in the year. All beta users will be given 1TB of free object storage during the beta period.

I think the lack of a pricing model and how short the free period is (until Oct 2017) makes it hard for many users to even justify testing it.

For me it seems if a developer has to spend more than an hour testing this new product they are better off using S3.

Post reply on HN