Live data from Hacker News

Man with tiny brain shocks doctors (2007)

newscientist.com

11–20 of 36 posts

Re: Man with tiny brain shocks doctors (2007)

#11

I’ve heard that most processing in the brain happens near the surface, while the central brain regions are more connective. Is that accurate and could it be a factor here? If he’s got otherwise mostly normal brain function, my gut reaction is that maybe those connections were just displaced or formed in other ways.

Article says his IQ is 75, which is quite low.

But he has a job in the civil service and a wife, which are more useful indicators than a high IQ

Re: Man with tiny brain shocks doctors (2007)

#13

The linked article within that story about the other person missing the entire cerebellum is also interesting.

It highlights how popular press write science stories too.

The article on absent cerebellum says 50% of neurons are there, clearly a smaller cross-sectional area is missing but this statement serves to increase the magnitude of the issue to the layman ... but in the article where it appears most of the cerebellum is present this key point on brain structure isn't noted; that would reduce the apparent magnitude of the injury.

That may be happenstance, or otherwise unintentional, of course.

Re: Man with tiny brain shocks doctors (2007)

#14

I’ve heard that most processing in the brain happens near the surface, while the central brain regions are more connective. Is that accurate and could it be a factor here? If he’s got otherwise mostly normal brain function, my gut reaction is that maybe those connections were just displaced or formed in other ways.

Perhaps the reduced volume brain is to some extent topologically normal? Same connections, same areas, different shape.

Re: Man with tiny brain shocks doctors (2007)

#15

This reminds me of dropout regularization where you improve a neural network by removing random neurons from the neural network. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dropout_(neural_networks) and https://youtu.be/u4alGiomYP4?t=33m53s

Dropout is only used during training a neural network and also neurons are turned off not removed.

Well, the brain is constantly trained and used. :)

Re: Man with tiny brain shocks doctors (2007)

#17
Another thread on HN points to article [1] that starts:

For decades now, I have been haunted by the grainy, black-and-white x-ray of a human skull. [...] The image hails from a 1980 [...]

Anyway to actually trace back that patient? Do we know who he is (I would like to read about his story and daily life; nothing creepy).

Do we know if he/she is still alive??

[1] http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=6116

Re: Man with tiny brain shocks doctors (2007)

#19
If this much of the brain is not completely necessary for its function then there are all kinds of questions raised.

What is the minimum viable human brain? If our brains are indeed highly-redundant scale-free networks, would it be possible to eliminate a precisely targeted 99% of neurons without significant degradation? Can we simulate 1% of a brain on today's supercomputers? How about emulating an existing brain? Do animals have the raw hardware to match or exceed human intelligence? Can we download human 'software' into modified animals instead of machines? Are we already being simulated?

This would keep me up at night too.

Post reply on HN