Earlier quoted context omitted.
I do not know whether you've read part 3 of this series. It explicitly treats matrix multiplication as function composition, and goes with this at length. As for the rest, you might be right or not; but I am not competent to reform world's math education. If you can write better linear algebra guides than the standard textbooks, I'm all for it. Please inform me if you do that, I'd love to read that. (BTW It's not sar…
I had not yet read it. Having just fixed it, it is missing the role of a basis. And without it, you'll have trouble figuring out coordinate systems, changing your basis, and so on. Which gives you no way to keep straight such confusing things as the fact that if your coordinate system rotates one way, your representation of things rotates the other. (Try it! Stand up, turn clockwise and see the world spin counter-clo…
Maybe I'm hopelessly lost, but, for one, the inverse of
( 1 1 1)
( 1 2 3)
( 1 2 4)
is not: ( 2 -1 0)
(-3 2 -1)
( 1 -2 1)
On the off chance you see this, any pointers?