Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
11–20 of 101 posts
Re: Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
#12Re: Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
#13From a layman: Would this necessitate a different programming paradigm?
Re: Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
#14Re: Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
#15What does the memory interface look like for this? None of the papers I can find indicate how you can get so much parallelism out of the CPU memory interface. An interesting approach to non-Von Neumann computing is to put ALUs in memory, to take advantage of the fact that DRAMs have far more internal bandwidth than what is exposed in traditional systems: http://researcher.ibm.com/researcher/files/us-leejinho/tvlsi...…
Yeah thats the big black box titled "magic happens here" in their diagram. Maybe something like HBM2?
Re: Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
#16From a layman: Would this necessitate a different programming paradigm?
Yes, it's mentioned on page 2 of the article (you may have missed it was two-paged)
Re: Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
#17From a layman: Would this necessitate a different programming paradigm?
Yes, it's mentioned on page 2 of the article (you may have missed it was two-paged)
Re: Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
#18Can't wait for this publicly funded research to make some private corporation billions!
Re: Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
#19Can't wait for this publicly funded research to make some private corporation billions!
Re: Darpa Funds Development of New Type of Processor
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, it's mentioned on page 2 of the article (you may have missed it was two-paged)
Yeah, that's a design choice I just don't understand. The article is already lengthy, what improvement does splitting it to pages manually give? I completely missed the fact that it's multiple pages.