The way for Buzz to instantly gain credibility would be for Google to take the Diaspora route and open it up as a decentralised platform. What I've found interesting is that part of what seems to be making Buzz more engaging is how it is tied to your real name (assuming that is what you use for Gmail) - but at the same time that has been part of what has made me hesitant to fully adopting it.
Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
11–20 of 22 posts
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#12Edit: Summary of issues (thanks, sandofsky):
* Reading updates feels like an obligation (river of news vs inbox)
* Doesn't encourage scanning thanks to inline media & longer content
* Visual clutter incl. redundant buttons
* Too many non-friends' comments are visible
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#13The way for Buzz to instantly gain credibility would be for Google to take the Diaspora route and open it up as a decentralised platform. What I've found interesting is that part of what seems to be making Buzz more engaging is how it is tied to your real name (assuming that is what you use for Gmail) - but at the same time that has been part of what has made me hesitant to fully adopting it.
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#14Unless Buzz solves the UX issues I wrote about when it came out, no. http://alanhogan.com/buzz-is-already-dead Edit: Summary of issues (thanks, sandofsky): * Reading updates feels like an obligation (river of news vs inbox) * Doesn't encourage scanning thanks to inline media & longer content * Visual clutter incl. redundant buttons * Too many non-friends' comments are visible
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#15Among normal people I know, Twitter has just recently actually become a thing that they're at least aware of and use a bit. They might have seen Google Buzz when it got unceremoniously foisted upon them (which I still think was a sleazy move on Google's part), but they ignored it and are probably more or less confused as to what value it offers them or even what it is. And frankly, so am I--I find using Twitter hard enough to rationalise, and left Facebook months ago. Why do I need yet another social network?
Scoble's life may revolve around churning up page views for his bullshit, and he may have the time and incentive to sign up for every new social media site that pops up and actually think that they matter, but the other 99.9% of us are too busy actually doing something productive with our lives.
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#16I gave up after this classic Scoble: "I know, I have 10,000 people following me..." Was there anything intelligent in this article, or more ego masturbation?
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#17Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#18I'm assuming Scoble is doing his usual act--that is, construing what he personally likes, what he sees in the Bay area, and what he hears from the "new media" sycophants that comment on his posts for how normal people operate. Among normal people I know, Twitter has just recently actually become a thing that they're at least aware of and use a bit. They might have seen Google Buzz when it got unceremoniously foisted…
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#19I gave up after this classic Scoble: "I know, I have 10,000 people following me..." Was there anything intelligent in this article, or more ego masturbation?
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#20Buzz really needs its own site and identity, separated from GMail. As much as Google likes it, their GMail/GDoc interface can be "busy" to me. I hope for cleaner interface, but this is just personal preference I guess.