Zero details and zero cross references, zero mentions on Google and zero mentions in any security list I'm on. Charlie blowing nonsensical steam yet again?
Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
11–20 of 190 posts
Re: Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
#12Re: Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
#13Re: Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
#14Re: Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
#15I can't say I'm surprised, but I am surprised at the fact that finally, after all these years, someone finally got down to patching some vulnerabilities in this area.
props to whomever forced Intel's hand.
Re: Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
#16Zero details and zero cross references, zero mentions on Google and zero mentions in any security list I'm on. Charlie blowing nonsensical steam yet again?
Now a patch is coming out but Intel is still trying to keep it quiet, so he's trying to warn people disable AMT and be ready to apply patches ASAP.
Presumably he didn't even want to disclose the existence of the vulnerability publicly until there was some sort of fix, and he still won't want to disclose details before the fix is released.
Of course, you can doubt the veracity of this story, but I'm just pointing out that there would be no reason to expect details, cross references, or mentions on Google or security lists yet if it is true.
Re: Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
#17My ignorance is showing, but what product lines are impacted? Obviously things like Xeons and Core iXs, but what about things like Atom processors in tablets?
The post appears to claim that literally everything is affected, albeit probably only locally exploitable. I think that's what it means at least.
Re: Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
#18Re: Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
#19So if you're running a desktop that has a physical Ethernet card in it, and the Intel Ethernet isn't connected, are you OK?
And if you're running on a laptop that uses Intel's Ethernet, (and most of them do?) then are you vulnerable?
Re: Intel platforms from 2008 onwards have a remotely exploitable security hole
#20Zero details and zero cross references, zero mentions on Google and zero mentions in any security list I'm on. Charlie blowing nonsensical steam yet again?
The article implies that they have been privately trying to get Intel to fix it, so there is no reason it would have been mentioned publicly anywhere. Now a patch is coming out but Intel is still trying to keep it quiet, so he's trying to warn people disable AMT and be ready to apply patches ASAP. Presumably he didn't even want to disclose the existence of the vulnerability publicly until there was some sort of fix,…