Live data from Hacker News

Apple pulls an Adobe, requires Apple Quicktime player but won't support it

rjsteinert.com

11–16 of 16 posts

Re: Apple pulls an Adobe, requires Apple Quicktime player but won't support it

#11
post #3

This is a rant about Apple using Quicktime for video on their site. I can view Quicktime on Firefox on Linux - while Flash only has one halfway decent player, Quicktime files are supported by many different tools & players.

I'm on Linux too, I can't view Quicktime unless I install illegal codecs.

"illegal" seems like a stretch. I'm on Ubuntu Karmic w/ Chrome and it plays fine through the totem plugin, with no quicktime-specific packages installed.

Re: Apple pulls an Adobe, requires Apple Quicktime player but won't support it

#12
post #8

I got the same thing in Chrome on OS X (however, I have all plug-ins disabled due to the current Flash vulnerability). I can’t imagine this is anything more than an oversight that will soon enough be corrected. The copy on that page is a bit rough, too: > Apple engineers designed the A4 chip to be a remarkably powerful yet remarkably power-efficient mobile processor. (emphasis mine) I think the page was a rush job, s…

This video is working fine for me with Chrome on Linux.

Re: Apple pulls an Adobe, requires Apple Quicktime player but won't support it

#13
post #12
post #8

I got the same thing in Chrome on OS X (however, I have all plug-ins disabled due to the current Flash vulnerability). I can’t imagine this is anything more than an oversight that will soon enough be corrected. The copy on that page is a bit rough, too: > Apple engineers designed the A4 chip to be a remarkably powerful yet remarkably power-efficient mobile processor. (emphasis mine) I think the page was a rush job, s…

This video is working fine for me with Chrome on Linux.

Hmm; Linux in 'video just works' shock!

Re: Apple pulls an Adobe, requires Apple Quicktime player but won't support it

#14
I\'m happy I found this blog, I couldnt discover any info on this subject matter prior to. I also run a site and if you want to ever serious in a little bit of guest writing for me if possible feel free to let me know, i\'m always look for people to check out my site. Please stop by and leave a comment sometime!

http://www.thebest-online-casinos.com/

Re: Apple pulls an Adobe, requires Apple Quicktime player but won't support it

#15
post #2

It’s not quite as simple as that – that becomes plainly obvious pretty fast in this related discussion: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1411779 They seem to use the video-tag in some cases (Safari, maybe Chrome) but not in others. We don’t yet know how exactly they decide whether to use the video-tag or QuickTime. The mystery isn’t yet solved so if anyone wants to help …

> They seem to use the video-tag in some cases (Safari, maybe Chrome) but not in others Not chrome, only Safari. So yes, this is basically the same thing as forcing flash as you either have to change the browser, get a new OS if you're on linux, install a plugin, download the file manually or cheat your user agent. Not very "standard" friendly to say the least.

[deleted]

Re: Apple pulls an Adobe, requires Apple Quicktime player but won't support it

#16
I have no respect for companies who don't use their own crap. If Jobs wants anti-flash, use html5 like he said, if it is not viable, then stfu. However maybe flash on the IPHONE makes no sense, but then say that, not that flash sucks because html5 is open and flash is not.

At least adobe uses flash on their stuff. Actually I wish they didn't but it shows they are confident with their product.

Post reply on HN