Live data from Hacker News

Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

volocopter.com

11–20 of 63 posts

Re: Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

#11

1. Helicopters (multi or single rotor) are significantly less fuel efficient than planes per distance and per time 2. Electric planes are just barely approaching the flying time that is anything beyond being a joke 3. These guys do not state their flying time My guess? It is so bad that it is not worth mentioning.

My guess is that this is intended to a completely different public than planes (short distances). Still looks like totally unrealistic for urban mobility IMO.

Re: Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

#12
While this is not a car replacement for everyone - the Volocopter will require a full pilot license to be flown, it should have a significant impact on small commercial and especially non-commerical flying. Helicopters are very expensive to operate and the Volocopter should bring down operation costs down to the levels of fixed-wing aircrafts, if not even below that, as it lacks any maintenance-intensive combustion engine.

Re: Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

#13
"Simply foolproof" aka unsinkable.

"Safety first" ... if safety was the primary concern one wouldn't ever step into a helicopter. Speed and convenience come first.

I would enjoy reading the market studies for these micro helicopters. Weight is a huge issue. Exactly how fat can the passengers be?

Re: Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

#14
I really like these. There is something to these kind of inventions that always puts them "just around the corner" category. This has been going on since https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moller_M400_Skycar in the 90's.

There is probably a combination of a tendency of people to dream about flying, and how much fun it would be, combined with the ignorance of all possible hurdles, not just physical and engineering ones, but also legal and regulatory.

Re: Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

#15

1. Helicopters (multi or single rotor) are significantly less fuel efficient than planes per distance and per time 2. Electric planes are just barely approaching the flying time that is anything beyond being a joke 3. These guys do not state their flying time My guess? It is so bad that it is not worth mentioning.

For urban moblity, let's take a use case of flying someone from central london to heathrow airport i.e. 20miles or 30km.

Assuming this thing could fly at 60km/h then a flight time of 30 minutes would be required.

I'm not aware of any electric VTOL vehicle with this capability at the moment. But we live in hope.

Re: Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

#16
Height control seems to be directly on the cyclic, without the combined height/throttle handle. I do not see yaw pedals, either.

Controls of this aircraft seem to be different enough from conventional helicopter (that at least license hours were flown in) to be a serious disadvantage for potential buyers. Another consideration could be how this thing reacts to wind gusts and how different that handles compared to conventional heli. These things could be important factors for potential customers.

Re: Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

#17

Height control seems to be directly on the cyclic, without the combined height/throttle handle. I do not see yaw pedals, either. Controls of this aircraft seem to be different enough from conventional helicopter (that at least license hours were flown in) to be a serious disadvantage for potential buyers. Another consideration could be how this thing reacts to wind gusts and how different that handles compared to con…

It seems like a big motivation behind this is to appeal to non aviation folk and make it a mainstream offering.

Re: Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

#19

I've been following e-volo for several years. I think they have a winning design here, unless there is an obvious design flaw I am not seeing.

Obvious design flaws: 1. it's really ugly 2. can't glide if the power fails

All helicopters have to be able to land after an engine failure to be certified. Google autorotor

Re: Volocopter 2x – Safer Alternative to a Personal Helicopter

#20
post #14

I really like these. There is something to these kind of inventions that always puts them "just around the corner" category. This has been going on since https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moller_M400_Skycar in the 90's. There is probably a combination of a tendency of people to dream about flying, and how much fun it would be, combined with the ignorance of all possible hurdles, not just physical and engineering ones, bu…

There's a self-flying taxi drone supposed to start operating in Dubai this summer.

> The Ehang is electric-powered and can travel for about 31 miles with a person and bag that weigh up to 100kg. It can go at speeds of up to 63 miles an hour and takes two hours to charge fully.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/02/14/self-flying...

Post reply on HN